Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 267

Dunn v. DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
May 10 2013

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of defendant DreamWorks Animation on plaintiff’s breach of implied-in-fact contract claim

Viacom International v. Google Inc.,

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
April 26 2013

On remand from the Second Circuit, district court grants summary judgment in favor of Google and its YouTube platform on all copyright infringement

UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor

Harper v. Maverick Recording Co

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
December 8 2010

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in copyright infringement action brought by record companies against plaintiff who asserted the “innocent infringer” defense, and Justice Alito dissents

Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.,

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
May 3 2013

District court grants summary judgment in favor of ABC News and related entities, finding that investigative journalist Gregory Slate was equitably

Benay v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
February 23 2012

District court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants on implied-in-fact contract, finding lack of privity between plaintiffs and defendants

Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
July 25 2012

Ninth Circuit affirms district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants on copyright infringement claims finding, as a matter of law, no substantial similarity between protected elements of plaintiff’s works and the defendants’ “CARS” movies, and that plaintiff’s claim for breach of an implied contract was time-barred under California’s two-year statute of limitations

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
June 20 2012

District court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement action brought by Louis Vuitton against Warner Bros., holding that because defendant’s use of a “knock-off” version of one of plaintiff’s bags in the film The Hangover: Part II was artistically relevant, and because any confusion it might cause was due to third party’s infringing product and not to defendant’s film, defendant’s non-commercial use was protected under First Amendment freedom of expression

Washington v. National Football League

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
July 5 2012

District court grants NFL’s motion to dismiss class action filed by former football players alleging that, by not allowing the players the rights to game films and images from the games in which they played, the NFL is monopolizing the market for former players’ likenesses, in violation of antitrust laws

Raw Films, Ltd. v. Does 1-32

Loeb & Loeb LLP
-
USA
-
October 12 2011

District court, on its own motion, severs all but one Doe defendant accused of committing copyright infringement by uploading and downloading pornographic film using peer-to-peer file sharing system BitTorrent, and orders plaintiff to show cause why certain of its conduct did not merit sanctions

next >