We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Hypothetical outcomes cannot be the basis for abstention

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2012

Judge Holderman denied defendants’ motion to stay plaintiffs’ (collectively "USWAY") trademark and copyright case involving its USWAY mark based upon the Colorado-River abstention doctrine

Soliciting Illinois customers creates jurisdiction

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 6 2012

Judge Kennelly denied defendant Andersen’s motion to dismiss this patent and trade secret case

Federal Circuit opens the door to misuse of reissue procedure by trolls

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 21 2012

Thanks to the Federal Circuit’s recent In re Staats decision, a favored patent troll tactic has just been strengthened

Officers can be liable for corporate trademark and copyright infringement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2012

Judge Der-Yeghiayan denied defendant Aksoy’s motion to dismiss in this Lanham Act case regarding the CHICAGO TROLLEY mark for use with Chicago Trolley Tours

“Special sharing” allows claims against corporate officer

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

Judge Finnegan denied individual defendant Lang’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) motion to dismiss this Lanham Act suit. Lang argued that plaintiff Lang