We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 430

Court stays attorney's fees determination pending appeal

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2011

Judge Kendall granted in part plaintiff Callprod's motion to stay determination regarding attorney's fees pending appeal of the underlying patent issues and the Court's determination as to whether the case was exceptional

Successful trademark plaintiff awarded its attorney's fees pursuant to a franchise agreement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 4 2012

Judge Dow awarded plaintiffs (collectively "Quizno's") their attorney's fees of approximately $28k in this franchise and trademark case involving Quizno's restaurants

September 2011 retail patent litigation report

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2011

September saw a massive upswing in patent retail patent litigations

New N.D. Illinois judges panel: Judge Feinerman

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2011

In late January, the Northern District's six newest judges attended a Federal Bar Association panel to offer insights into their practices and chambers

New N.D. Illinois judges panel: Judge Kim

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2011

In late January, the Northern District's six newest judges attended a Federal Bar Association panel to offer insights into their practices and chambers

July 2013 retail patent lit report

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2013

July saw several frequent fliers filed actions Ameranth, ArrivalStar, Arunachalam, Eclipse IP, Clouding IP, Cascades Branding, and UbiComm

Induced infringement claims need not use the word “induce”

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2013

Judge Kocoras denied defendants’ Beissbarth GmbH (“Beissbarth”) and Robert Bosch, GmbH’s (“Bosch Germany”) (collectively “German Defendants”) Fed. R

Reply expert reports must only respond to rebuttal reports

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2013

Judge St. Eve granted in part Defendant’s (collectively “Zurn”) motion to strike plaintiff Sloan Valve’s (“Sloan”) reply expert report in this patent

Expert testimony required for one infringement issue

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

Judge Lefkow granted plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine limiting defendant ISE’s expert testimony consistent with prior rulings regarding the scope of

Court reconsiders ruling re patent settlement agreement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 12 2011

Judge Zagel granted in part defendants' motion to reconsider the Court's prior ruling regarding the parties' settlement agreement in this case regarding a patent to a system of pooling life insurance policies to create a predictable income stream