Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 341
Preliminary injunction partially entered in trademark suit
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 1 2013
Judge Kapala granted the agreed portions of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in this trademark case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY
Courtesy copies of complaints required by Local Rule 5.2(f)
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 29 2013
In each of these cases, Judge Shadur entered similar orders requiring the plaintiff to provide the Court a courtesy copy of its newly filed complaint
Arguments disclosed in summary judgment are preserved
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 26 2013
Lefkow granted in part plaintiff CBOE’s motion to strike defendant ISE’s expert witness in this patent case, as follows: This case was not governed
Claim construction reconsidered in motion in limine
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 24 2013
Judge Lefkow considered defendant ISE’s arguments that the Court’s construction of “means for matching” was incomplete because it did not define an
Expert may not opine on claim construction at trial
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 22 2013
Judge Lefkow granted defendant ISE’s motion to exclude plaintiff CBOE’s evidence of non-infringing alternatives from the lost profits analysis in
Enablement not required for each obviousness reference
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2013
Judge Lefkow granted plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine excluding argument that 103 obviousness references must each be enabling in this patent case
Specific jurisdiction created by accrued sales to Illinois
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 19 2013
Judge Kennelly denied defendants U Lighting America and its sole officer and employee’s (collectively “ULA”) motion to dismiss this patent suit for
Weight of the evidence cannot be decided in motion in limine
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 17 2013
Judge Lefkow granted in part plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine to exclude defendant ISE from introducing evidence of secondary consideration of
December 2012 retail patent litigation report
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 16 2013
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc, (C.D. Cal.) (multiple cases). Judge: Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato Claim:
Expert testimony required for one infringement issue
- Holland & Knight LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 15 2013
Judge Lefkow granted plaintiff CBOE’s motion in limine limiting defendant ISE’s expert testimony consistent with prior rulings regarding the scope of
