We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 28

Spam maker sues prem maker for trademark and trade dress infringement

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2011

Hormel Foods, LLC has filed a complaint in a Minnesota federal court against a company that also makes a canned meat product, alleging that the company is infringing Hormel's SPAM trademark, which consists of yellow lettering on a blue background

Chicago hot dog makers at odds

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2011

Alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition, Vienna Beef Ltd. has sued a descendant of one of its founders and the competing hot dog company he established in 1986

Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2011

A New York City deli has filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking a declaration that it has not infringed the trademark of an Arizona-based restaurant by selling an "Instant Heart Attack Sandwich" and planning to sell a "Triple Bypass Sandwich."

“Sleepy” tea designations brew trademark dispute

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 27 2011

Celestial Seasonings has filed a complaint against Mexican and Texas companies that are allegedly infringing its Sleepytime trademark with a tea product sold under a "Sleeping Time" mark

Chipotle claims Kroger chicken product infringes and dilutes its trademark

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 13 2012

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., which operates 1,250 “fast-casual” restaurants throughout the United States, has sued The Kroger Co. in Colorado federal court, alleging that the grocery store chain has infringed the CHIPOTLE trademark by using the descriptor on its spicy fried chicken take-out products

Second Circuit confirms frivolous finding in hoisin sauce trademark infringement litigation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2012

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld an award of $10,000 in sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for the filing of a frivolous action related to trademark infringement litigation between companies that make and sell hoisin sauce

Court rulings

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2012

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has decided which of the parties sued over an E. coli outbreak that sickened dozens of Sizzler Steak House patrons in 2000 and caused the death of a 3-year-old are liable for consequential damages, indemnity and costs under various supply chain and insurance contracts

Trademark infringement alleged over pistol-shaped bottle for adult beverages

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 27 2012

The Mexican owner of U.S. and Mexican trademarks for an “automatic pistolshaped bottle design used in connection with alcoholic beverages, with the exception of beers” and its exclusive U.S. distributor have filed trademark infringement claims against the company that sells, markets and imports into the United States Eagle Shot Tequila in a pistol-shaped bottle

Lawsuits concluded: no trademark for “Texas Toast,” no class claims for Joe’s Crab Shack employees, no racial discrimination class claims against McDonald’s, no wrongful death suit against Dole Food, no antitrust action against Whole Foods

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2012

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that the Roskam Baking Co

JibJab sues White Castle for infringing mark in social media ad campaign

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 18 2012

JibJab Media Inc., a digital media company known for its photo cut-out animated videos sometimes used as political satire, has filed a trademark infringement suit against White Castle, alleging that the fast-food chain has infringed its trademarks by launching a social media ad campaign called “Jib Jab Chicken Ring” to promote its “chicken rings” menu item