We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 461

The AIPLA antitrust news - February 2015

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 23 2015

Our Committee was kept busy during the last quarter of 2014. On October 8, 2014, the Committee prepared and presented an AIPLA webinar entitled

American Idol winner turns the legal spotlight on talent show’s contestant agreements

  • Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2015

In a move that music industry insiders have characterized as a "bombshell," American Idol season 11 winner, Phillip Phillips, launched a legal action

Dictating the use of a celebrity’s likeness: former Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega ousted from court

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 16 2014

Video game developer Activision Blizzard, Inc. recently won a key victory in the ongoing battle over the right of publicity when a California state

NFL Films ruling blurs right of publicity

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Earlier this year the Seventh Circuit stated that "there is no judicial consensus on how to resolve conflicts between intellectual-property rights

Not all fun and games in copycat litigation

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2014

The gaming industry (and gamers) will be watching two recent US cases with great anticipation. In these cases, law suits have been brought against

Note to musical performersyou are only “entertaining” when you are performing live

  • Dykema Gossett PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2014

All of you Vine Starsyou may think you are entertaining with your online performances, but according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO

Third Circuit nixes presumption of irreparable harm in comparative false advertising cases

  • McCarter & English LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2014

Continuing a trend that began in 2006 with the Supreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third

Arrow Productions, Ltd v. The Weinstein Company LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2014

District court dismisses copyright and trademark infringement claims of copyright owner of 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat, holding that

Third Circuit rejects presumption of irreparable harm for injunctive relief under Lanham Act

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

Following a series of recent appellate decisions across the spectrum of intellectual property disciplines, including the fields of patent, copyright

California Supreme Court halts creeping expansion of advertising injury

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

Commercial general liability policies typically provide coverage for claims based on "personal and advertising injury." Increasingly, enterprising