We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 10

Wendy’s is on a roll with super-sized SALT wins

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 19 2012

Wendy’s International, Inc. (“Wendy’s”) recently prevailed in state income tax cases in Virginia and Oklahoma

US removes Brazil from piracy list

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Brazil, USA
  • -
  • April 26 2011

Brazil has been removed from a list of "notorious markets" of piracy and smuggling that was recently published by the US Trade Representative (USTR

House of Representatives approves executive order allowing the country to apply trade sanctions relating to IP rights

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2010

On 8 June 2010, the House of Representatives approved Executive Order No. 482 which provides for the application of trade sanctions established by the World Trade Organization (WTO) against the intellectual property rights of other countries in case of non-compliance with the WTO's rules

Transatlantic cooperation on patent processing

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • May 5 2010

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have agreed to cooperate to reduce patent processing backlogs in both countries' patent offices

Florida federal court finds that a “click wrap” end user license agreement is unenforceable because the employees who accepted the terms of the agreement did not have the authority to bind the corporation

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 13 2010

In the case of National Auto Lenders, Inc v Syslocate, Inc, the US District Court of the Southern District of Florida decided that the defendant's "click-to-accept" or "click wrap" end user license agreement (EULA) was unenforceable against the plaintiff corporation in spite of the fact that plaintiff's employees had accepted the terms of the EULA

Executive order authorises and regulates cross retaliation measures relating to IP matters for violation of WTO agreements

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Brazil, USA
  • -
  • April 6 2010

The Brazilian President enacted Executive Order 482, which provides for retaliation measures authorised by the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) regarding the non-compliance by the US with the DSB's decisions on the "US - Subsidies on Upland Cotton" case, that considered certain US subsidies incompatible with the obligations adopted within the WTO Agreements and recommended the elimination of such subsidies

Maryland federal court refuses to enforce poorly drafted forum selection clause

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2010

In a case that serves as a lesson for drafting forum selection clauses, on 23 February 2010, the US District Court for the District of Maryland determined in Micro Focus, Inc. v. Bell Canada that it could not enforce a forum selection clause that was “nonsensical”

Federal court determines that software company infringed open source license by distributing software in violation of license

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2010

On 10 December 2009, in the case of Jacobsen v Katzer, et al, the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment regarding copyright infringement

Software Freedom Conservancy files copyright infringement claim for violation of the GNU General Public License

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2010

On 14 December 2009, Plaintiffs, the Software Freedom Conservancy (Software Freedom) and Erik Andersen (Andersen), filed a complaint in US federal court against a number of companies selling electronic products (Defendants) containing embedded open source computer software

Transfer of software license agreement without consent of licensor in connection with a corporate merger infringes licensor’s copyright

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 6 2009

In the case of Concom Systems, Inc. v Novelis Corp., No. 07-4142 (6th Cir. 25 September 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Cincom on its claim of copyright infringement arising out of a series of mergers Novelis underwent as part of an internal corporate restructuring that resulted in a prohibited transfer of a software license