We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,687

Circuits split regarding validity of federal subsidies of health insurance purchased on federally-established exchanges

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

Two federal appeals courts have issued opposing decisions regarding whether the IRS has the authority under the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") to extend

Charting the future of premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act: Halbig v. Burwell and King v. Burwell

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

On July 22, 2014, two federal appellate courts issued conflicting decisions, within hours of each other, regarding the IRS final rule published on

Future of the Affordable Care Act in jeopardy in many states

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

A same-day split decision has created an uncertain future for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).Yesterday, two Circuit Courts

Halbig v Burwell: D.C. appeals court strikes Obamacare health insurance subsidies

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled, in a 2-to-1 decision, in Halbig v. Burwell that the IRS is not authorized under the Affordable

The latest on the use of retained asset accounts to pay life insurance benefits

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 21 2014

In Merrimon v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America, 2014 WL 2960024 (1st Cir. July 2, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit became

Health plans that intend to drop contraceptive coverage must notify plan participants

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

In response to the recent U.S. Supreme Court holding in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that closely held, for-profit entities with religious objections to

Hobby Lobby: likely first of many cases pitting religion against ACA

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30, 2014, ruled 5-4 that a closely held, for-profit corporation can qualify for an exemption from the U.S. Department

Employers that reimburse employees' individual insurance premiums could be subject to serious penalties

  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

An employer that directly reimburses employees on a pre-tax basis for premiums paid by an employee for non-employer sponsored health insurance

De facto plan administrator claims in the First Circuit

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

According to 29 U.S.C. 1132(c)(1)(B) of ERISA, it is within a court's discretion to award a penalty of up to $110 per day based on an

Overview of the Protect Women's Health from Corporate Interference Act of 2014

  • Roetzel & Andress
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Yesterday, Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Women's Health from Corporate Interference Act of 2014, which would apply to group health plans