We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 207

Three strikes on defective work insurance claim

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2014

A federal appeals court recently retired, in short order, a contractor's insurance claim arising from defective work. The claim arose when scratches

Second Circuit - architect's faulty designs were two separate defects

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 15 2014

On June 23, 2014, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case Dormitory Authority of the State of New York v. Continental

Anti-indemnification statutes and their impact upon insuring indemnification obligations versus those of an additional insured

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

Construction projects are inherently risky endeavors. A myriad of things that can go wrong range from damaging a tree on neighboring property, to the

California Appellate Court affirms damages resulting from faulty construction not “property damage”

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 23 2014

In Regional Steel Corporation v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation, -- Cal.Rptr.3d --, 2014 WL 2643242 (Cal. App. 2d Jun 16, 2014) (Regional

Swimming against the tide on coverage for faulty workmanship

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2014

During the past twelve months, five State Supreme Courts have considered whether faulty workmanship of a construction contractor can constitute a

Professional services exclusion may not be a complete bar on coverage when insured also performs construction work

  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2014

On March 13, the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, ruled that a question of fact regarding whether an insured performed work

Think you are covered by an additional insured endorsement? Recent opinion serves as a reminder to read the coverage language

  • Ober Kaler
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion this month that should serve as a reminder to prime contractors to review

Indiana courts wrestle with “Work” v. “No-Work” distinction in waiver of subrogation cases

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

When confronted with the argument that a party has waived its claims under an AIA standard waiver of subrogation provision, Indiana has traditionally

General contractors beware: coverage under additional-insured endorsement to subcontractor’s CGL policy may end when subcontractor’s work is complete

  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

Within the past four months, two courts interpreting Mississippi law have held that an additional-insured endorsement to a subcontractor's commercial

Did you know? Recent changes in the law that may impact your construction projects in the Southeast

  • Adams & Reese LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that forum selection clauses should be upheld in most circumstances. Have you used a forum selection clause in