We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 232

Ninth Circuit enforces waiver of subrogation clause in designbuild agreement against post-construction property insurer

  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2014

This action arose out of the construction of the University of Phoenix Stadium (the “Stadium”), home of the Arizona Cardinals. Tourism and Sports

Mind the details: make sure your wrap coverage is done right

  • Nossaman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2014

A client recently asked for advice about insuring their development project with a wrap insurance policy. As we talked through the pros and cons, I

More “Texas justice” for policyholder on contractual liability exclusion

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2014

On October 29, the Fifth Circuit reversed itself for the second time this year in a case involving the interpretation of a contractual liability

Fifth Circuit see-saw on contractual-liability exclusion

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has gone back and forth, and back again, in deciding just what an exclusion in the standard

Defective work on a building pad that results in structural damage is not considered an “accident” that would trigger coverage for an “occurrence” under a CGL policy in Kentucky

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

Structural damage to a new building caused by a defective building pad may not be covered under a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy

Regional Steel: the continuing effort to avoid the cost of correcting the insured’s work

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2014

Casualty insurers normally do not expect to pay the cost of their insureds simply doing a good job. Insurers typically view their contracts as

New Jersey appeals court addresses duty to defend, certificates of insurance

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

In Selective Insurance Co. v. Hospicomm, Inc., 2014 WL 4722776 (N.J. Super. A.D., Sept. 24. 2014), the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior

Construction case law update - October 4, 2014

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 6 2014

Applying the Amerisfactors, the Middle District of Florida abstained from and dismissed indemnitor's declaratory judgment action to determine

Federal court in Mississippi holds surety is limited to relying on position upon which coverage was denied

  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

A federal court in Mississippi ruled that a surety was limited to the defenses raised in a coverage denial, notwithstanding the fact that the surety

Eighth Circuit holds Arkansas statute requiring coverage for faulty work cannot be applied retroactively

  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that an insurer properly denied coverage of claims arising out of a contractor's alleged faulty