We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 274

Fraudulent schemes in life settlements investments: avoid falling into a scam

  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2015

Since 2008, many individuals have been looking for investments outside of bonds or the stock market that provide guaranteed payments at higher rates

Financial ruin and the duty to settle within policy limits

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 17 2013

A liability insurance company has the right to take over the defense of a policyholder and to control all settlement discussions. What happens if the

A guide to surviving the Lumbermens rehabilitation & liquidation

  • Dentons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 2 2012

In response to the July 2, 2012 Order of Rehabilitation, and an anticipated Order of Liquidation, against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, we have prepared the following “frequently asked questions” guide summarizing issues related to: (i) the financial regulation of insurance companies; (ii) the liquidation and proof of claim process in Illinois; (iii) potential recovery by policyholders of the amount of “covered” workers’ compensation claims from state guaranty associations; (iv) policyholder collateral; and (v) planning a response to the Lumbermens liquidation

Security interests in business interruption insurance under the UCC

  • Ice Miller LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2015

A recent decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit, Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company v. Keach, ruled that a lender

Priority of payments provision allows insurer to make settlement payments on covered claims against directors and officers

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 25 2012

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska has held that an insurer may make settlement payments for claims against a debtor’s directors and officers where any claims of the debtor are subordinate to those of the directors and officers under the terms of the policy

New restrictions on creditors’ rights exclusions in title insurance policies

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 12 2010

Anyone who obtains title insurance, whether as an owner or a lender, should be aware of a recent abrupt and significant change in title insurance practices across the country

“Covered or not covered: that is the question” - a discussion of directors & officers insurance coverage issues

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2011

It is important that directors and officers insurance provide the necessary protections

What is happening to AIG?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2009

This morning, March 2, 2009, American International Group, Inc. ("AIG") announced a loss of $61.7 billion for the fourth quarter of 2008, a total net loss for 2008 of $99.29 billion, and a major restructuring of its operations, including a new federal infusion of $30 billion, forgiveness of certain debts, and relaxation of prior bailout terms

A guide to surviving the Kemper liquidation

  • Dentons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2010

In response to an imminent Order of Liquidation against the Kemper Insurance Companies, we have prepared the following "frequently asked questions" guide summarizing issues related to: (i) the financial regulation of insurance companies; (ii) the liquidation and proof of claim process in Illinois; (iii) potential recovery by policyholders of the amount of "covered" workers' compensation claims from state guaranty associations; (iv) policyholder collateral; and (v) planning a response to the Kemper liquidation

‘Contingent claim’ not sufficient to establish right of setoff for lift-stay motion

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

The debtor’s insurer sought to lift the automatic stay in order to setoff $2.2 million in return premiums against potential defense costs that the insurer expected to incur related to certain insurance claims made against the debtor