We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 11,711

Deposit insurance assessment system

  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) recently published for comment a proposed rule containing modifications to the deposit insurance

Captive insurance: feds promote tax benefits, but pay attention to the details

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2014

Recent IRS rulings and a U.S. Tax Court decision continue to lay a solid foundation for captive insurance companies. However, the tax requirements

6th circuit: excess insurance triggered by primary’s refusal to defend

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

When a primary insurer improperly refused to provide coverage, an excess insurer should have stepped in, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court recently ruled

“Insured v. insured” exclusion in D&O policy doesn’t preclude coverage to bank execs for FDIC suit

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • Puerto Rico, USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico held that a D&O policy's "insured v. insured" exclusion did not foreclose coverage

Washington Supreme Court rules that it was error to delay adjudication of insurer's duty to defend, but should stay discovery as to insurer's coverage defenses

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

The Washington Supreme Court handed down two holdings that should significantly benefit policyholders. Recognizing that a duty to defend is

Insured person under CGL policy did not include supervisory employee

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

Applying a limited reading of an insured's policy providing coverage for "directors," the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a

Sixth Circuit clarifies scope of Medicare Secondary Payer liability for non-group health plans

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

On July 16, 2014, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that a "health care provider can bring the Medicare Secondary Payer Act's ("MSP's"

Are medical marijuana dispensaries covered entities under HIPAA?

  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

I was talking to a colleague recently and she raised an interesting question - are medical marijuana dispensaries covered entities under the Health

Circuit courts clash over tax subsidies for health insurance purchased on federally-run exchanges

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2014

This is the 44th in a series of WorkCite articles concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its companion statute, the Health

ERISA (8th Circuit): over-the-counter vitamin supplements trigger pre-existing condition exclusion

  • Lane Powell PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

Here’s the case of Kutten v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 3562784 (8th Cir. July 21, 2014) (pdf). FACTS: Kutten had a