We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 31

Faulty workmanship can be an accident

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

After a spate of bad decisions for policyholders on whether general liability policies can ever provide coverage for construction liabilities, three

District court judge confirms summary judgment victory for policyholder regarding the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

In January, we reported on developments in Wiseman Oil Co. v. TIG Insurance, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Western

Fifth Circuit reverses District Court in Deepwater Horizon insurance coverage litigation and grants BP unlimited access to Transocean’s $750 million in insurance as 'additional insured'

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

On March 1, 2013, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in In re Deepwater Horizon, No. 12-30230, 2013 WL

When did this happen?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2013

In most states, the most famous exception being Louisiana, there's no such thing as a "direct action" against an insurance company by the allegedly

New development regarding MSP private enforcement provision

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

A recent case out of a district court in Michigan suggests medical providers may have a new method to obtain payment for bills that were denied by an

Another win for Pennsylvania policyholders concerning the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 6 2013

Policyholders with pollution-related liabilities in Pennsylvania scored another win in January, in the ongoing litigation battle with insurance

Pennsylvania courts struggle with insurance coverage for defective product claims

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

In 2012, Judge Wettick of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas issued two decisions that have the potential to significantly limit the

‘Contingent claim’ not sufficient to establish right of setoff for lift-stay motion

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

The debtor’s insurer sought to lift the automatic stay in order to setoff $2.2 million in return premiums against potential defense costs that the insurer expected to incur related to certain insurance claims made against the debtor

Lumbermens enters rehabilitation: what are the consequences for its policyholders?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2012

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company (part of the Lumbermens Mutual Group and formerly known as Kemper) (“Lumbermens”), after years of struggling financially under the supervision of the Illinois Department of Insurance, recently entered rehabilitation proceedings

Supreme Court finds health care reform constitutional

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

On June 27, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, upholding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “ACA”

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy