We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 182

Illinois federal court rules that reinsurer’s motion to vacate arbitration award is untimely under the Federal Arbitration Act

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 4 2010

R&Q Reinsurance Co. v. American Motorist Ins. Co., involved a dispute arising under a series of reinsurance treaties entered into by the parties

Chinese drywall first bellwether trial ongoing

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2010

The first federal trial in the nationwide Chinese drywall controversy began on February 19th, 2010 in New Orleans and is ongoing

Third Circuit revives limited portions of in re: insurance brokerage antitrust litigation (MDL 1663)

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2010

Nearly three years after a federal district court dismissed with prejudice a nationwide class action alleging antitrust and RICO claims against insurers and brokers in connection with contingent commission arrangements, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a limited swath of plaintiffs' claims

Connecticut trial court dismisses passenger’s insurer from uninsured motorist lawsuit

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 10 2009

The Connecticut Superior Court recently granted the motion for summary judgment of a passenger’s insurer in a lawsuit concerning uninsuredunderinsured motorist coverage on the basis that the amount of potential coverage was capped and coverage under this excess insurer’s policy was not recoverable

Federal court upholds an arbitration panel’s award requiring a cedent to pay its reinsurer’s attorneys’ fees

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2010

National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA entered into a reinsurance treaty with Odyssey America Reinsurance Corporation, which contained an arbitration clause

First Circuit remands D&O coverage dispute for allocation

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2010

Reversing a district court holding to the contrary, the First Circuit has declared that Massachusetts public policy does not prohibit D&O carriers from insuring against damages allegedly incurred by one class of shareholders as a result of an unfair benefit conferred on another class of shareholders

Court finds coverage excluded for shooting by security guard

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

A California Appeals Court recently held that a wrongful death action against a security guard who shot a man while on duty was excluded under an "assault and battery" exclusion, even if the security guard acted in self-defense

NY court: insured may recover consequential damages absent insurer bad faith

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 23 2009

On December 15, 2009, New York's Appellate Division for the First Department held that an insured need not allege or prove that its insurer acted in bad faith in order to recover consequential damages stemming from the insurer's breach of the policy

Connecticut Appellate Court affirms award of summary judgment in favor of title insurer and finds policy exclusion applies and insurer did not breach the covenant of good faith and fair dealing

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2009

In Lauren Heyse, et al. v. William Case, et al., AC No. 29289 (Conn. App. Jun. 2, 2009), the insured, a resident of a common interest community, brought a lawsuit to challenge the rights of another property owner within the common interest community to subdivide a lot within the common interest community

Connecticut Supreme Court affirms summary judgment for insurer on because prior administrative proceeding for unemployment benefits constituted a related claim

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2010

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurance company on the basis that a wrongful termination lawsuit against an insured was related to a prior administrative action for unemployment benefits and was therefore excluded by the policy