We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Fifth Circuit holds insured’s negligent drilling did not cause property damage

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2012

In its recent decision in PPI Tech. Servs., L.P. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24571 (5th Cir. Nov. 29, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, applying Texas law, had occasion to consider what damages qualify as “property damage” for the purpose of a general liability policy

Missouri court addresses owned property exclusion

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2012

In its recent decision in Clarinet v. Essex Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7300 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2012), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri had occasion to consider whether a general liability policy afforded coverage for an insured’s obligation to stabilize and later demolish its own building so as to prevent damage to third-party property

Eleventh Circuit holds repair of insured’s work not covered property damage

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2011

In its recent decision Palm Beach Grading, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14576 (11th Cir. July 14, 2011), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a holding by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that costs associated with repair of the insured’s own work does not constitute “property damage” under a general liability policy

Minnesota Supreme Court applies pollution exclusion to carbon monoxide

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 4 2013

In its recent decision in Midwest Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wolters, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 304 (Minn. May 31, 2013), the Minnesota Supreme Court had

Application of exclusion to drywall claim does not render coverage illusory

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 20 2011

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has held on several occasions that the pollution exclusion applies to Chinese drywall claims

Supreme Court of Wisconsin holds pollution exclusion applies to bat guano

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2012

In its recent decision in Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2012 Wisc. LEXIS 16 (Mar. 6, 2012), the Supreme Court of Wisconsin had occasion to address whether a pollution exclusion in a homeowners policy applied to bar coverage for property damage resulting from bat guano contamination