We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 149

Third Circuit finds additional insured coverage based on peculiar risk doctrine

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 16 2011

In its recent decision Lafayette College v. Selective Insurance Company, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22721 (3d Cir. Nov. 10, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, applying Pennsylvania law, addressed under what circumstances additional insured coverage may be triggered

Alabama Supreme Court holds PRP letter triggers duty to defend

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2013

In its recent decision in Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Ala. Gas Corp., 2012 Ala. LEXIS 174 (Ala. Dec. 28, 2012), the Supreme Court of Alabama addressed

Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

In its recent decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10754 (W.D. Ok. Jan. 28, 2013), the United States District for the

New York court holds professional services exclusion applicable

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

In its recent decision in David Lerner Assocs. V. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46333 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013), the United

Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for

7th Circuit holds no coverage for restitution claim under D&O policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 13 2012

In its recent decision in Ryerson Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 2102 U.S. App. LEXIS 7372 (Apr. 12, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, applying Illinois law, had occasion to consider whether an underlying suit seeking rescission of a fraudulent transaction triggered coverage under a directors and officers liability policy

California court holds no coverage for Prop 65 case

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2011

California’s Proposition 65 of the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1965, 25249.5 et seq., is a “remedial statute” which, among other things, requires “businesses to warn individuals about carcinogens and reproductive toxins to which they may be exposed through commercial transactions, employment, and the environment.” Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmileCare, 91 Cal.App.4th 454 (Cal.App. 2001

Fifth Circuit holds insured’s negligent drilling did not cause property damage

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2012

In its recent decision in PPI Tech. Servs., L.P. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24571 (5th Cir. Nov. 29, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, applying Texas law, had occasion to consider what damages qualify as “property damage” for the purpose of a general liability policy

Illinois court addresses coverage for trade dress infringement

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 23 2011

In its recent decision Priceless Clothing Co. v. Travelers Casualty Ins. Co. of America, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53833 (N.D.Ill. May 19, 2011), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois had occasion to consider the scope of advertising injury coverage afforded under a general liability policy

Florida court addresses breach of duty to cooperate

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 25 2011

In its recent decision titled Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Diamond Title of Sarasota, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52831 (M.D.Fla. May 17, 2011), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida had occasion to consider the duties imposed on an insured pursuant to a policy’s cooperation clause