We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 201

11th Circuit holds curry aroma is a pollutant

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2011

In its recent decision in Maxine Furs, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 6706 (11th Cir. March 31, 2011), a case decided under Alabama law, the Eleventh Circuit closely aligned itself with the line of authority holding that the pollution exclusion is not limited to traditional environmental pollution

Florida court holds no coverage for related claims under E&O policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 14 2012

In its recent decision in Zodiac Group v. Axis Surplus Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176622 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 13, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida had occasion to consider whether an insured was entitled to coverage under a claims made and reported professional liability policy for a newly filed lawsuit related to a earlier suit filed prior to the policy’s date of inception

Texas court holds prior knowledge exclusion in E&O policy inapplicable

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2012

In its recent decision in OneBeacon Insurance Company v. T. Wade Welch & Associates, et al., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178587 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas had occasion to consider the application of a prior knowledge exclusion in a professional liability policy

California court reaffirms negligent professional advice not an occurrence

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2012

In its recent decision in Aquarius Well Drilling, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172770 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2012), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California had occasion to consider whether an insured’s professional negligence constituted an occurrence for the purpose of triggering coverage under a general liability policy

Sixth Circuit holds supplier is a subcontractor under business risk exclusion

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2011

In its recent decision Mosser Constr. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 2011 FED App. 0481N (6th Cir. July 14, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, applying Ohio law, had occasion to consider what constitutes a “subcontractor” for the purpose of a “your work” exclusion in a general liability policy

Florida court holds criminal conduct exclusion in E&O policy applicable

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 12 2013

In its recent decision in Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159639 (S.D. Fla

Texas court holds department of insurance proceeding is a “claim”

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2013

In its recent decision in Regency Title Co. v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162772 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2013), the United States

Maryland court holds prejudice rule applies to claims made and reported policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

In its recent decision in Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. Med. Benefits Administrators of Maryland, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22631 (D. Md. Feb. 21

1st Circuit addresses “insured location” exclusion in homeowner’s policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 11 2013

In its recent decision in Vermont Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zamsky, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20569 (1st Cir. Oct. 9, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for

South Carolina court awards insured declaratory judgment fees through appeal

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2012

In a matter involving an issue of first impression under South Carolina law, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, in its recent decision in Jessco, Inc. v. Builders Mutual Insurance Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62114 (May 3, 2012), considered whether an insured is entitled to recover fees and costs after successfully litigating a declaratory judgment action on appeal