We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 366

Lipstick on a pig: a claim’s preamble does not confer patentability on an otherwise unpatentable process

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 22 2011

In CyberSource v. Retail Decisions (decided August 16, 2011), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the claims in a software patent do not escape the patentability standards articulated in Bilski v. Kappos just by virtue of being drafted as so-called “Beauregard” claims

Definitive guidance on software patent eligibility?

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2012

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has agreed to take on the topic of patent eligibility for computer-implemented inventions

ALJ gildea sets procedural schedule in Inv. No. 337-TA-778

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2011

On July 25, 2011, ALJ Gildea set the procedural schedule for Investigation No. 337-TA-778, Certain Equipment for Communication Networks Including Switches, Routers, Gateways, Bridges, Wireless Access Points, Cable Modems, IP Phones, and Products Containing Same

ALJ Gildea rules on motion for protective order and cross-motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (337-TA-794)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

On April 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 34 (dated February 24, 2012) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (Inv. No. 337-TA-794

ALJ Bullock grants motion to terminate investigation in certain electronic devices having a digital television receiver (337-TA-774)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2011

On August 11, 2011, ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 5 (dated August 11, 2011) in Certain Electronic Devices Having A Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-774

ALJ Essex grants motion to terminate investigation as to Sabrent in certain computers and computer peripheral devices (337-TA-841)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 11 2012

On October 10, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 24 in Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-841

Commission finds no violation, terminates investigation 337-TA-670

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2010

The Commission has found no violation of Section 337 in Inv. No. 337-TA-670, Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof, and terminated the investigation

Apple v. samsung: jury verdict

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2012

Apple obtained a $1.05 billion verdict in the Northern District of California

ALJ Essex denies motion to dismiss in Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices (337-TA-804)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 26 2011

According to the Order, Respondent Shantou Nanguang Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd. (“Nanguang”) filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

PTO today grants 7,000th class 977 nanotechnology patent

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2011

Patents are much in the press these days with respect to patent reform legislation, recently passed by the House and Senate