We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 38

ALJ Essex grants Microsoft’s motion for summary determination of Barnes & Noble’s patent misuse defense in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices (337-TA-769)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2012

On February 13, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 32 (dated January 31, 2012) granting Microsoft’s Motion for Summary Determination, thereby eliminating an affirmative defense of patent misuse raised by Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof

ALJ Gildea rules on motion for protective order and cross-motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (337-TA-794)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

On April 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 34 (dated February 24, 2012) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (Inv. No. 337-TA-794

Apple v. samsung: jury verdict

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2012

Apple obtained a $1.05 billion verdict in the Northern District of California

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2012

On August 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 61 (dated July 26, 2012), Order No. 65 (dated July 31, 2012), Order No. 66 (dated August 2, 2012) and Order No. 68 (dated August 2, 2012) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

ITC decides to review-in-part initial determination and terminate the investigation in Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2013

On February 15, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice and terminated the investigation in Certain

ITC terminates investigation with finding of no Section 337 violation in Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices (337-TA-841)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2014

On December 19, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice terminating the investigation with a finding of no

ALJ Shaw denies motion to amend complaint and grants motion to terminate investigation based on lack of standing in Certain Devices With Secure Communication Capabilities (337-TA-818)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2013

On April 9, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Orders No. 14 and 15 (both dated July 18, 2012) in Certain Devices with Secure

ALJ Pender issues public version of Initial Determination in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices (337-TA-796)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2013

On December 28, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version (dated October 24, 2012) of the Initial Determination ("ID") finding a violation

Elpida Memory files new 337 complaint regarding dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) semiconductor devices

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 16 2011

On November 15, 2011, Elpida Memory, Inc. of Japan and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. of Sunnyvale, California (“Elpida”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337

Furuno files new 337 complaint regarding certain navigation products

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2011

On September 30, 2011, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan and Furuno U.S.A., Inc. of Camas, Washington (collectively, “Furuno”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337