We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37

ALJ Gildea denies respondents’ motion for summary determination in Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (337-TA-853)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On May 7, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 29 (dated April 17, 2013) denying Respondents LG Electronics, Inc. and LG

ALJ Shaw issues public version of initial determination in Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2013

Further to our December 18, 2012 post, on January 16, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public version of the Initial Determination ("ID") dated

Canon files new 337 complaint regarding certain toner cartridges

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2012

On January 23, 2012, Canon Inc. of Japan, Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York, and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (“CVI”) (collectively, “Canon”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337

ALJ Gildea rules on motion for protective order and cross-motion to compel in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (337-TA-794)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 20 2012

On April 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 34 (dated February 24, 2012) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers (Inv. No. 337-TA-794

USPTO to require means plus function claims for software related patents?

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2013

Despite public misconceptions to the contrary, software is not patentable. Of course, aspects of software, or “software related” patents exist in which an

ALJ pender orders parties to submit executive summary of pre-hearing briefs in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music And Data Processing Devices (337-TA-745)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2011

On November 28, 2011, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 27 in Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music And Data Processing Devices, Computers and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-745

ALJ Essex grants motion to terminate investigation as to Hon Hai Precision and Foxconn in certain handheld electronic computing devices (337-TA-769)

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2011

On November 28, 2011, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 23 in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-769

Furuno files new 337 complaint regarding certain navigation products

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2011

On September 30, 2011, Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan and Furuno U.S.A., Inc. of Camas, Washington (collectively, “Furuno”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337

Elpida Memory files new 337 complaint regarding dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) semiconductor devices

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 16 2011

On November 15, 2011, Elpida Memory, Inc. of Japan and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. of Sunnyvale, California (“Elpida”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337

Proper business method patent challenges under the America Invents Act?

  • Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2011

The race to the USPTO door may start very shortly for those defendants charged with infringement of a “business method patent.”