Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 37

ALJ Gildea denies respondents’ motion for summary determination in Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (337-TA-853)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
May 10 2013

On May 7, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 29 (dated April 17, 2013) denying Respondents LG Electronics, Inc. and LG

ALJ Shaw denies motion to amend complaint and grants motion to terminate investigation based on lack of standing in Certain Devices With Secure Communication Capabilities (337-TA-818)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
April 22 2013

On April 9, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Orders No. 14 and 15 (both dated July 18, 2012) in Certain Devices with Secure

ITC decides to review-in-part initial determination and terminate the investigation in Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
February 19 2013

On February 15, 2013, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice and terminated the investigation in Certain

ALJ Shaw issues public version of initial determination in Certain Microprocessors (337-TA-781)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2013

Further to our December 18, 2012 post, on January 16, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public version of the Initial Determination ("ID") dated

ALJ Pender issues public version of Initial Determination in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices (337-TA-796)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 22 2013

On December 28, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version (dated October 24, 2012) of the Initial Determination ("ID") finding a violation

USPTO to require means plus function claims for software related patents?

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 7 2013

Despite public misconceptions to the contrary, software is not patentable. Of course, aspects of software, or “software related” patents exist in which an

ALJ Gildea denies private parties’ joint motion to terminate investigation in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
November 30 2012

On November 27, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 73 in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

ALJ Essex grants motion to terminate investigation as to Sabrent in certain computers and computer peripheral devices (337-TA-841)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
October 11 2012

On October 10, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 24 in Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-841

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 27 2012

On August 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 60 (dated July 26, 2012), Order No. 62 (dated July 30, 2012), and Order No. 67 (dated August 2, 2012) regarding various motions in limine filed by Complainant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

Apple v. samsung: jury verdict

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 25 2012

Apple obtained a $1.05 billion verdict in the Northern District of California

next >