We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 390

China and Russia accused of internet spying on S companies

  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2011

US intelligence agencies just reported to Congress that China and Russia have national policies to steal technology from US companies over the Internet

Prison ban on pen-pal advertising does not violate the first amendment

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2011

In 2005, the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Corrections suspected that inmates were using pen-pal internet sites to fraudulently obtain money

For school tablet computer rollouts, don’t forget potential legal stumbles

  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 6 2012

The Illinois Association of School Administrators recently alerted followers on Twitter (IllinoisASA) to an interesting blog entry by Eric Lai for UberMobile entitled “Four Reasons Why School Tablet Rollouts Can Stumble Or Fail.”

Search and collection of data efforts critiqued in foia case

  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 25 2012

In her latest opinion in the National Day Laborer matter, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York highlights many of the pitfalls encountered in identifying, collecting, searching, and producing relevant information in the discovery process

Last week at the FEC: extension of the Administrative Fine Program

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2014

Last week the Federal Election Commission did not meet, but released a final rule extending its Administrative Fine Program, which was reauthorized

Proposed DFARS rule would impose new protection and reporting requirements on defense contractors

  • Venable LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2011

On June 29, 2011, the Department of Defense (DoD) proposed a rule to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add a new subpart and contract clauses to require the safeguarding of unclassified DoD information and mandate the reporting of “cyber incidents.” 76 Fed. Reg. 38089 (June 29, 2011

PA's right to know does not extend to personal email accounts

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2011

Whether a person is elected, appointed or hired by an agency, what's theirs is theirs

Who do you trust? Proposed cybersecurity bill would encourage public-private cyber threat information exchange by providing legal immunity

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 22 2011

“Who Do You Trust” was a 1950’s game show that required players to decide whether they could rely upon the information provided by their partners to win cash prizes of $25, $50 and $75

The USA Patriot Act and the privacy of data stored in the cloud

  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2012

European consumers have expressed concern that the USA Patriot Act (the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001” or “Patriot Act”) will afford the US government undue and unfettered access to their data if they choose to store it on the cloud servers of US providers (e.g., Microsoft or IBM

The ever-lengthening parade of PHI security breaches - the new paper chase of four Massachusetts community hospitals

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2010

This blog has been reporting on the effects on providers, insurers and others of the HIPAAHITECH statutes and regulations that require public disclosure of breaches of unsecured Protected Health Information ("PHI"