We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Your licensee knows your confidential, proprietary technology and just acquired your main competitor: can you sue for threatened trade secret misappropriation?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2011

A federal court in Washington State issued a ruling last week in Edifecs, Inc. v. Tibco Software, Inc., further limiting grounds for seeking trade secret relief arising out of the acquisition by a licensee of the licensor’s primary competitor

Non-competition v. unfair competition in California

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2011

We all know that California does not permit enforcement of non-compete agreements

Nothing personal: High Court rules that corporations may not avail themselves of FOIA's personal privacy exemption

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2011

In an 8-0 opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court held yesterday that Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”)which exempts from mandatory disclosure law enforcement records the release of which “could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy”does not protect information belonging to a corporation, as opposed to a human being

Court limits use of zip codes in Massachusetts credit card transactions

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2013

In a recent decision, Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc., the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that zip codes are "personal identification

Don’t forget common sense

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 21 2013

Today, Foley & Lardner LLP issued a Legal News Alert for our clients regarding the recent decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that