We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,310

Courts can't seem to find meaning in "loss"

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2012

The debate in the courts continues as to what exactly constitutes a compensable “loss” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA

Another twist on the copyright law?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2010

Interesting discussion from the Fox Rothschild Employment Group last week concerning employer searching of employee after-hour pager messages

PA's right to know does not extend to personal email accounts

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2011

Whether a person is elected, appointed or hired by an agency, what's theirs is theirs

U.S. Supreme Court rules FOIA personal-privacy exemption applies to individuals not corporations

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption barring the release of law enforcement records whose release “could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy” is inapplicable to documents provided to a federal agency by a corporation

2011 Mid-Year E-Discovery Update

  • Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2011

This 2011 Mid-Year E-Discovery Update analyzes trends and developments in e-discovery based on our review of 187 e-discovery decisions from the federal courts issued between January 1 and June 15, 2011

Employees' expectations of privacy limited when using company-issued electronic devices

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 23 2010

On June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Quon v Arch Wireless Operating and The Ontario Police Department

No Fourth Amendment violation in government administrative subpoena to ISP for subscriber information

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2010

An administrative subpoena served upon a defendant's Internet service provider to obtain his subscriber information did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled, because the defendant had no reasonable expection of privacy in his subscriber information

N.J. Supreme Court says warrants required for cell phone location data

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2013

Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in State v. Earls that New Jersey residents have a constitutional right of privacy in their cell phone

Court finds that deletion of documents under subpoena to be subject to criminal contempt, appoints U.S. attorney to prosecute contempt allegations

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2008

Alleging interference with a fair housing lawsuit pending in the Eastern District of Virginia, intervening plaintiffs served a subpoena on the defendant seeking production of electronic information and computers used by the defendant in connection with the alleged interference

Definitive guidance on software patent eligibility?

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2012

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has agreed to take on the topic of patent eligibility for computer-implemented inventions