We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 38

Managing risk in legal process outsourcing

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2009

Just a few years ago in 2005, legal process outsourcing (LPO) provoked comments that today seem almost primordial, at least to some extent

Recent developments in US privacy law: HIPAA, COPPA, and more

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2013

Once upon a time, it was fair to say that tackling data privacy issues within an organization was comparable to playing the "whack-a-mole" game at

Cloud provider obligations as business associates under HIPAA

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 12 2013

Users and providers of Software-as-a-Service, remote data storage solutions, online services and other cloud offerings have been struggling for a

MacDermid, Inc. v. Deiter, 702 F.3d 725 (2d Cir. 2012)

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • March 25 2013

Plaintiff MacDermid Chemicals ("MacDermid"), a Connecticut company, decided to terminate the employment of Defendant Jackie Deiter, who worked and

Employee has reasonable expectation of privacy in emails sent on work computer

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2010

The New Jersey (NJ) Supreme Court decided a novel question about the extent to which an employee can expect privacy and confidentiality in personal emails with her attorney, which emails the employee accessed on a computer owned by her employer

Maryland federal court refuses to enforce poorly drafted forum selection clause

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2010

In a case that serves as a lesson for drafting forum selection clauses, on 23 February 2010, the US District Court for the District of Maryland determined in Micro Focus, Inc. v. Bell Canada that it could not enforce a forum selection clause that was “nonsensical”

Recent developments for the third quarter 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

This letter is from the Global Equity Services ("GES") group in San Francisco, Chicago and New York. Attorneys in the GES practice group work

Intermediary liability global

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, India, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 25 2012

They have also been a number of overseas developments that are of interest from an Australian perspective given the ongoing debate surrounding the issue

HIPAA privacy and security: are you in compliance?

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 24 2012

In November 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") began a random audit pilot program of 150 covered entities for compliance with the privacy and security requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"

Take that back: drivers and considerations for insourcing

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 27 2012

This past year, Baker & McKenzie conducted a survey of customers and service providers to evaluate what factors drive value in successful outsourcing engagements