We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 49

DOJ announces largest immigration-related settlement in US history, another example of heightened immigration enforcement actions across the globe

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • India, USA
  • -
  • November 25 2013

After a two-year investigation, the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has announced a USD 34 million civil settlement with Infosys, one of the largest

Florida federal court finds that a “click wrap” end user license agreement is unenforceable because the employees who accepted the terms of the agreement did not have the authority to bind the corporation

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 13 2010

In the case of National Auto Lenders, Inc v Syslocate, Inc, the US District Court of the Southern District of Florida decided that the defendant's "click-to-accept" or "click wrap" end user license agreement (EULA) was unenforceable against the plaintiff corporation in spite of the fact that plaintiff's employees had accepted the terms of the EULA

Cookie regulation not just a European issue: regulator issues guidance on California's online privacy protection and its recent Do Not Track amendments

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 27 2014

California’s Attorney General issued much-awaited guidance following recent Do Not Track amendments to the California Online Privacy Protection Act

Directors see reputation, cybersecurity, and regulation as top risks

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2014

Accounting firm EisnerAmper has released its fifth annual survey of directors, Concerns About Risks Confronting Boards. The results indicate that

U.S. Federal Trade Commission is serious about enforcement of the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • February 18 2014

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced on January 21, 2014 that 12 companies from a wide array of industries handling a variety of

Maryland federal court refuses to enforce poorly drafted forum selection clause

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2010

In a case that serves as a lesson for drafting forum selection clauses, on 23 February 2010, the US District Court for the District of Maryland determined in Micro Focus, Inc. v. Bell Canada that it could not enforce a forum selection clause that was “nonsensical”

Supreme Court rules against certain government prosecutions in “aggravated identity theft” decision

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2009

On May 4, 2009 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the government’s most aggressive use of the “aggravated identity theft” statute, in Flores-Figueroa v. United States

Global action taken against global Microsoft Imposter telemarketing scam

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, Canada, Global, USA
  • -
  • September 28 2012

Joint action between the ACMA, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Canadian Radio television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has led to court orders being obtained against US-based and India-based parties involved in the global 'Microsoft Imposter' phone scam

PCAOB standing advisory group panel sparks debate over audit committee cybersecurity role

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2014

As described in the June 2014 Update, SEC Commissioner Luis Aguilar raised questions in a recent speech as to whether the audit committee should be

Recent developments for the third quarter 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Australia, China, European Union, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

This letter is from the Global Equity Services ("GES") group in San Francisco, Chicago and New York. Attorneys in the GES practice group work