Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 27

Liability insurers may have duty to defend against federal prosecutions, California Court of Appeal holds

Barger & Wolen LLP
-
USA
-
May 6 2013

The Second Appellate District of California held on May 1 in Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopez that California Insurance Code section 533.5(b) does not

Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for

Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
February 1 2013

In its recent decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10754 (W.D. Ok. Jan. 28, 2013), the United States District for the

GAO and federal court weigh in on Section 111 infirmities but it's business as usual for CMS during town hall call

Wiley Rein LLP
-
USA
-
April 27 2012

The most newsworthy Section 111 developments come from a federal District Court that recently declared a legal malpractice insurer not to be a Responsible Reporting Entity (RRE) and the U.S. Da Silva Moore

Reinsurer’s request to belatedly amend “imprecise” pleading denied due to lack of diligence

Jorden Burt LLP
-
USA
-
September 6 2011

Employers Reinsurance Corporation was denied a request to correct “imprecise” language in its answer and counterclaim in a suit brought against it by a medical malpractice insurer for failing to fund a settlement of a lawsuit against one of the malpractice insurer’s covered physicians

Insurer has broad discretion to settleeven over its insured’s objection

Jorden Burt LLP
-
USA
-
August 18 2011

Dr. Mohan Papudesu was a defendant in a wrongful-death lawsuit

Motions for summary judgment granted in part, denied in part, in action brought by hospital against insurer to recover for breach of contract for premiums drawn down from letter of credit: Lenox Hill Hosp. v. Amer. Int'l Group, Inc.

Farrell Fritz PC
-
USA
-
July 26 2011

In a June 7, 2011 decision by Justice Fried, the Court granted in part and denied in part cross-motions for summary judgment

Dental malpractice coverage required under senate-approved legislation

Duane Morris LLP
-
USA
-
June 24 2011

Legislation that requires dentists to carry malpractice insurance cleared the Senate

District court narrowly interprets bodily injury exclusion

Wiley Rein LLP
-
USA
-
June 23 2011

The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia has narrowly construed a bodily injury exclusion in a professional liability insurance policy in connection with determining that coverage existed for negligent supervision claims against the insured related to allegations of patient molestation by the insured’s employee

Professional liability policy proceeds not property of bankruptcy estates

Wiley Rein LLP
-
USA
-
June 23 2011

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada has held that proceeds from a professional liability policy were not property of the insured-debtors' bankruptcy estate because the proceeds were payable only for the benefit of third party claimants and could not be accessed by the debtors directly

next >

Search results

Liability insurers may have duty to defend against federal prosecutions, California Court of Appeal holds

Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service

Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim

GAO and federal court weigh in on Section 111 infirmities but it's business as usual for CMS during town hall call

Reinsurer’s request to belatedly amend “imprecise” pleading denied due to lack of diligence

Insurer has broad discretion to settleeven over its insured’s objection

Motions for summary judgment granted in part, denied in part, in action brought by hospital against insurer to recover for breach of contract for premiums drawn down from letter of credit: Lenox Hill Hosp. v. Amer. Int'l Group, Inc.

Dental malpractice coverage required under senate-approved legislation

District court narrowly interprets bodily injury exclusion

Professional liability policy proceeds not property of bankruptcy estates

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea