We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,549

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Bernard Nash and Lori Kalani Antitrust Settlement to Resolve Allegations of Unlawfully Restrained Competition Obtained by New York Attorney General

EEOC issues new guidance on pregnancy, outlines broader accommodation requirements for pregnant employees

  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

On July 14, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued new guidance on pregnancy discrimination in the workplace. The document, titled

Four myths of the Hobby Lobby decision: separating fact from fiction

  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Unless you have been living on another planet the past few weeks, you have probably heard that the United States Supreme Court rendered a decision in

Religious institutions update: July 2014

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that an existing contraceptive coverage mandate violates the Religious Freedom

Courts will have to determine boundaries of Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

Two years after upholding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Supreme Court has narrowed the Act's contraceptive coverage

EEOC issues new guidance on pregnancy discrimination

  • Roetzel & Andress
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

On Monday July 14, 2014, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") issued new enforcement guidance on pregnancy discrimination. The

Supreme Court blocks union dues requirement for Illinois in-home health care providers

  • Schiff Hardin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2014

On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled unenforceable an Illinois "fair share" law that requires in-home health care service providers to pay union

False claims by any other name: Medtronic and Omnicare cases illustrate the interplay between the False Claims Act and other federal laws regulating commerce with Medicare and Medicaid

  • Saul Ewing LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

Medtronic, Inc. has agreed to pay $9.9 million to the U.S. government to bring a False Claims Act ("FCA") suit focused on eight years' worth of

Supreme Court invalidates union fee requirements imposed on homecare employees

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Illinois law that required homecare providers for Medicaid recipients to pay fees to a union. In

Supreme Court limits agency fees to full-fledged public employees

  • Ford & Harrison LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

In a decision that could have a significant financial impact on many labor unions, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that personal care providers, who