Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 942
Inadvertent disclosure did not waive privilege and crime fraud exception held not to apply even though disclosed document may show that plaintiff's counsel told plaintiff it had a weak legal claim
- Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 22 2013
After the plaintiff, Peerless Industries, Inc. ("Peerless") produced an arguably privileged document to the defendant, Crimson AV LLC ("Crimson"
Rutgers Law Review article advocates replacing restitution litigation with prosecutions
- Sullivan & Worcester LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 22 2013
The Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion has published a provocative article that advocates a bold new take on Holocaust art restitution litigation
Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal holds statute establishing standard of proof in slip-and-fall cases is retroactive
- Wilson Elser
- -
- USA
- -
- May 21 2013
In Kenz v. Miami-Dade County and Unicco Service Co., 2013 (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 2013), Florida's Third DCA ruled that 768.0755, Fla. Stat
New civil marriage law could increase income tax costs, may offer estate tax benefits
- Leonard, Street and Deinard
- -
- USA
- -
- May 21 2013
On May 14, 2013, Governor Dayton signed a bill modifying Minnesota Statutes Sections 517 and 518. The bill enacts changes in Minnesota's marriage law
Be careful what you put in your e-mail
- Loeb & Loeb LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 20 2013
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently held, in connection with a criminal prosecution, that information a
No coverage for claim first made prior to inception of claims-made policy
- Wiley Rein LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, applying New Hampshire law, has held that no coverage was available for a legal
Last minute amendment by counsel to augment fee claim rejected by court
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 15 2013
In Duchrow v. Forrest, 2013 DJAR 5534 (2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a unique fee claim arising in a
Sanctions are issued where court determines that special motion to strike was filed for improper purpose
- Barger & Wolen LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 14 2013
In Kleveland v. Siegel & Wolensky LLP, 2013 DAR 4961(2013) the California Courts of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District affirmed the denial of a
Evidence of undue influence in Kentucky
- Bryan Cave LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 14 2013
A common theme here is that undue influence cases tend to be very fact specific. Last month, in Mays v. Porter, the Kentucky Court of Appeals gave us
Warrantless cell phone searches a look at the case law
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
- -
- USA
- -
- May 14 2013
When a person is arrested with a cell phone, law enforcement officers will likely want to search the phone's contents. Today's smart phones are a
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Aaron D. Van Oort (15)
- Brian P. Sharkey (27)
- David J. McMahon (21)
- Eric S. Solotoff (12)
- Gary Long (20)
- Greg Fowler (22)
- Luke Lantta (30)
- Nathan Adams (10)
- Neil Guthrie (12)
- Simon Castley (22)
Firm Name
- Barger & Wolen LLP (24)
- Bryan Cave LLP (36)
- Day Pitney LLP (35)
- Duane Morris LLP (25)
- Faegre Baker Daniels (34)
- Fox Rothschild LLP (61)
- Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (70)
- Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC (27)
- Proskauer Rose LLP (28)
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP (32)
Jurisdiction
- Argentina (1)
- Australia (1)
- Canada (5)
- Czech Republic (2)
- France (2)
- Global (1)
- Italy (1)
- Mexico (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
