We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 942

Inadvertent disclosure did not waive privilege and crime fraud exception held not to apply even though disclosed document may show that plaintiff's counsel told plaintiff it had a weak legal claim

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

After the plaintiff, Peerless Industries, Inc. ("Peerless") produced an arguably privileged document to the defendant, Crimson AV LLC ("Crimson"

Rutgers Law Review article advocates replacing restitution litigation with prosecutions

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

The Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion has published a provocative article that advocates a bold new take on Holocaust art restitution litigation

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal holds statute establishing standard of proof in slip-and-fall cases is retroactive

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

In Kenz v. Miami-Dade County and Unicco Service Co., 2013 (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 2013), Florida's Third DCA ruled that 768.0755, Fla. Stat

New civil marriage law could increase income tax costs, may offer estate tax benefits

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

On May 14, 2013, Governor Dayton signed a bill modifying Minnesota Statutes Sections 517 and 518. The bill enacts changes in Minnesota's marriage law

Be careful what you put in your e-mail

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently held, in connection with a criminal prosecution, that information a

No coverage for claim first made prior to inception of claims-made policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, applying New Hampshire law, has held that no coverage was available for a legal

Last minute amendment by counsel to augment fee claim rejected by court

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

In Duchrow v. Forrest, 2013 DJAR 5534 (2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a unique fee claim arising in a

Sanctions are issued where court determines that special motion to strike was filed for improper purpose

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In Kleveland v. Siegel & Wolensky LLP, 2013 DAR 4961(2013) the California Courts of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District affirmed the denial of a

Evidence of undue influence in Kentucky

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A common theme here is that undue influence cases tend to be very fact specific. Last month, in Mays v. Porter, the Kentucky Court of Appeals gave us

Warrantless cell phone searches a look at the case law

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

When a person is arrested with a cell phone, law enforcement officers will likely want to search the phone's contents. Today's smart phones are a