We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 64

Barriers to insurance coverage for personal injury claims lowered in Illinois and Missouri

  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

Two recent state appellate court decisions, one applying Illinois law and the other applying Missouri law, have reduced barriers to insurance

Attorney-client privilege analyzed by Idaho federal court in insurance company's bad faith case

  • Bullivant Houser Bailey PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

In an opinion issued April 3, 2013, the Idaho federal district court held that when an attorney participates in the investigation of a claim and

Seventh Circuit requires notice at early signs of potential suit under “claims made” policy

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

In Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky, P.C. V. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co., No. 12-1579, 2013 WL 1296724 (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013), the Seventh Circuit

Insureroutside counsel communications not privileged in bad faith action

  • Jenner & Block
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2013

In Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., No. 11-cv-3111 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 3, 2012), applying Georgia law, the court held that communications

Business pursuits exclusion of a professional liability policy found to preclude coverage for the insured law firm and its attorney

  • Sedgwick LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2013

An Illinois Appellate Court held that a lawyers professional liability policy's business pursuits exclusion barred coverage for an underlying civil

Human body parts and the duty to defend: people are not cars, my friends

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 15 2013

Illinois courts once considered whether non-OEM body parts could restore a damaged automobile to its "original" condition. This year, Texas upped the

California Court applies products hazardcompleted operations hazard aggregate limits to policyholder’s asbestos claims

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 8 2013

In Plant Insulation Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, et al., No. 06-448618, 2013 WL 391459, at 5, 10-11 (Cal. Super. Jan. 31, 2013

The privilege is in the policy: tripartite attorney-client relationship arises where insurer retains counsel pursuant to policy termsto prosecute or defend

  • Sedgwick LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

In Bank of America v. Superior Court, ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___, 2013 WL 151153 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth

Mississippi court holds no coverage for molestation claim under E&O policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

In its recent decision in Tudor Ins. Co. v. Manchester Educ. Found., Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8458 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 22, 2013), the United States

Who? What? When? “Ware” an Illinois appellate court addresses the “number of occurrences” issue

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2013

A recent Illinois Appellate Court decision has ruled that damages arising from a porch collapse in 2003 arose from a single occurrence. Ware, et al

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy