We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Actualité internationale

  • Landwell
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • December 22 2011

Le Conseil d’État, dans une décision du 29 juin 2011 rendue dans le cadre de la convention franco-américaine, a indiqué qu’un résident fiscal de France pouvait bénéficier d’un crédit d’impôt sur un salaire relatif à une activité exercée aux États-Unis et imposable aux États-Unis compte tenu des dispositions de la convention, même en l’absence d’une imposition effective aux États-Unis

Agreement for “direct use immunity” did not preclude federal prosecutors from sharing defendant’s incriminating proffer statements with foreign (or state) authorities

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • June 23 2009

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that a criminal defendant’s agreement with federal prosecutors not to use against him any statements made by him during proffer sessions did not bar the U.S. Attorney’s Office from sharing his incriminating statements with authorities in France who then used the statements against him in French criminal proceedings