We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 565

Ashley II holdings require caution

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On April 4, 2013, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a much anticipated decision in PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ashley II of Charleston LLC, No

Maryland to impose new Stormwater Remediation Fee; Virginia enacts Congestion Relief Fee

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

Lawmakers in Maryland and Virginia have approved the imposition of certain new fees on property owners in various jurisdictions. Maryland property

Federal Court of Appeals addresses Superfund liability of brownfield developers

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

In a case of first impression regarding brownfield developer liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

CERCLA liability - current owner's inaction bars liability defense

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

On April 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a bona fide prospective purchaser's (BFPP) inaction with respect to

Detroit stormwater drainage fee

  • Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) has begun to impose a storm water "drainage fee" on commercial land serviced by its sewer system

Community associations & Maryland's new stormwater fees

  • Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

Maryland has new local stormwater fees that will be implemented in certain counties beginning July 1, 2013. All real property, including those owned

Court rules purchaser of remediated site not a potentially responsible party

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

A federal magistrate in Texas has recommended the dismissal of claims filed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Equal protection claims concerning disparate enforcement of environmental laws remain an uphill battle

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2013

In 2000, in its 2-page per curiam opinion in Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, the Supreme Court gave hope to developers and property owners that the

Residential project exempt from CEQA review under Government Code Section 65457 as consistent with specific plan for which program EIR previously certified

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

In a recently published opinion construing Government Code 65457's exemption from environmental review for a residential development

Developer liable to clean up pre-existing contamination for failing to exercise “appropriate care”

  • Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

A buyer of contaminated property was held to have lost its ability to claim to be a non-liable "bona fide prospective purchaser" under CERCLA because