We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

In the matter of Texas Eastern Overseas, Inc.

  • Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2009

In this opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed the statutory scheme embodied in Sections 278 and 279 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) and granted petitioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings seeking the appointment pursuant to Section 279 of a receiver for respondent, a dissolved Delaware corporation

N.J. appeals court says D&O policy’s pollution exclusion does not bar coverage for securities fraud suit alleging misrepresentation concerning asbestos claims

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2008

The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, in an unpublished decision, has ruled that the pollution exclusion in a directors and officers insurance policy does not bar coverage for defense costs and damages arising from an underlying suit alleging securities misrepresentations regarding contingent liabilities for pollution claims