We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Indiana Supreme Court requires insurers to pay for environmental cleanup

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2012

The Indiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc. on March 22, 2012

Insurers uphill fight on coverage in Indiana

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 6 2011

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provided insurance companies doing business in Indiana with guidance on how to draft pollution exclusion clausesprovisions typically included in commercial general liability ("CGL") policies that seek to exclude coverage for claims based on environmental contamination

Indiana Court of Appeals clarifies landlord liability for toxic torts

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2010

On November 24, 2010, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in Neal v. Cure

Seventh Circuit upholds Indiana’s pollution exclusion jurisprudence

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2010

Indiana is known for the tough standards it imposes on insurance companies with respect to withholding coverage based on policy exclusions