We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 38

On the heels of Caronia: New York Appellate Court rejects medical monitoring costs based on mere inhalation of toxic substance

  • Blank Rome LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2014

Following the New York Court of Appeals’s landmark decision last December in Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.,No. 227, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 3476 (N.Y

Washington outlook for 2014

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • Taiwan, USA, Vietnam
  • -
  • January 13 2014

As Congress returns this month, ML Strategies is pleased to continue our tradition of offering an Outlook for the coming year. This year, in addition

Pennsylvania Superior Court rules expert testimony inadmissible to prove causation in toxic tort case absent supporting scientific authority applied to facts of case

  • Blank Rome LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2013

In a precedential ruling on the admissibility of expert testimony that is particularly significant to defendants in toxic tort matters, a three-judge

California suit may decide who pays for pharmaceutical take-backs

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2013

Take a look in your medicine cabinet. Chances are you have medications that are expired or you will not use. Do you know what you should do with them

Illinois court refuses to enforce non-solicitation clause in physician’s employment agreement

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2013

The Illinois Appellate Court's recent decision in Gastroenterology Consultants of North Shore, S.C. V. Meiselman, 2013 IL App (1st) 123692

MoFo Tech: SpringSummer 2013

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2013

Behind every trend are new complications. And, often, laws trying to flatten the wrinkles the trends have wrought. Look at social media, for example

Chemical industry trade association challenges proposed Prop. 65 listing for BPA

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 8 2013

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) has filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in a California state court against California EPA's

Only “known carcinogens” may be listed under Prop. 65, California court rules

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 16 2012

A California appeals court has refused to allow the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to identify styrene and vinyl acetate as carcinogens under the Safe Drinking Water Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65), ruling that the agency failed to provide sufficient evidence that the chemicals are “known” to cause cancer. Styrene Info. & Research Ctr. v. OEHHA, No. C064301 (Cal. App. Ct. 103112

Medical monitoring claim rejected by federal court

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

Readers know that medical monitoring claims are a focus of MassTortDefense

The Supreme Court - June 25, 2012

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2012

The Supreme Court of the United States announced decisions in three cases this morning