We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 3,821

US Supreme Court to consider D.C. Circuit’s ruling on USEPA’s MATS rule

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2014

The US Supreme Court has granted a petition for certiorari in a case challenging USEPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which set new

SDNY decision penalizes parties who voluntarily clean up sites under New York’s Brownfield Clean Up Program

  • Phillips Lytle LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2014

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as Superfund, was enacted by Congress to promote

Clean up a property? The SOL for your CERCLA contribution action may begin to run a lot earlier than you thought

  • Phillips Lytle LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 4 2014

The statute of limitations (“SOL”) for seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA

Federal district court doubles down, vacates Hawaii County GMO ban

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 4 2014

On November 26, Magistrate Judge Barry Kurren struck down Hawaii County’s Ordinance 13-121, which restricts the open-air growth and cultivation of

District Court holds County Ordinance preempted by Hawaii state law

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 3 2014

On November 26, 2014, the U.S. District Court for Hawaii issued a ruling holding that a Hawaii County Ordinance purporting to place restrictions on

Coal ash regulation update

  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2014

The U.S. EPA’s efforts to develop a new regulatory path for coal ash (“Coal Combustion Residuals” or “CCR”) by regulating the material either as a

District Court finds Partnership may have case against EPA "anti-mine assessment team"

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 2 2014

On November 25, 2014, the U.S. District Court for Alaska granted a preliminary injunction enjoining and restraining EPA and the EPA Regional

Analysis of GHGS under CEQA just got more complex: Fourth District’s split decision invalidates program EIR for SANDAG’s 2050 Regional Transportation PlanSustainable Communities Strategy

  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

In a 2-1 published opinion filed November 24, 2014, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 1, affirmed and modified the trial court's judgment

Supreme Court to review EPA mercury rule

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

Please be advised that today, November 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an order granting petitions for a writ of certiorari

Class action round-up - fall 2014

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

A class of industrial purchasers of polyurethane products brought suit against Dow Chemical Company for fixing the prices of those products. After