Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-3 of 3
Bona fide prospective purchaser defense rejected by Fourth Circuit because purchaser did not exercise appropriate care after closing
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 8 2013
An owner of real property claiming the bona fide prospective purchaser (BFPP) defense under Section 107(r)(1) of CERCLA has the burden of
Rapanos wetlands confusion: Third Circuit accentuates the circuit split
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 4 2011
When the United States Supreme Court issued its wetlands defining decision in Rapanos v. United States, environmental practitioners, real estate developers, and consultants believed that boundaries would be set for determining when a wetland was regulated under the Clean Water Act
Ohio environmental statutes of limitation: did the Ohio Supreme Court affect environmental claims?
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 10 2011
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision on April 27 in Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. v. Airline Union’s Mortgage Company, et al, 2011-Ohio-1961, raises interesting environmental questions
