We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 299

New York Supreme Court pro rata allocation for MGP sites on Long Island clarifies self-insured periods

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

A New York State trial court judge applied a pro rata time on the risk allocation for pollution from manufactured gas plants on Long Island.Keyspan

10th Cir. rejects claim that pollution exclusion in liability policies are ambiguous and inapplicable

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2014

On October 20, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling that the commercial liability

Texas Supreme Court will decide important CERCLA insurance matter

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2014

The Texas Supreme Court confirmed that it will decide an issue of Texas law that was certified to the Court by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Civil penalties arising from EPA consent decree are covered by general liability insurance

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2014

A Louisiana federal court held in Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Ins. Co. that a general liability insurer must indemnify its

Texas Court of Appeals holds excess insurer obligated to pay after primary insurers settled for less than full limits of underlying policies

  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

An appellate court in Texas reversed summary judgment for an excess insurer, finding that the primary insurers did not have to exhaust policy limits

NE Supreme Court issues insurer-friendly decision on the applicability of the pollution exclusion

  • Cozen O'Connor
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2014

In interpreting the scope of the pollution exclusion, one question seems to appear in case after case what exactly does the pollution

Pollution exclusion doesn’t bar coverage for worker exposed to hazardous chemicals that were not “dispersed”

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

A federal district court in Texas strictly construed a pollution exclusion in finding that hazardous materials embedded in mud were not "dispersed"

Infrastructure, insurance, and climate change oh my!

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 22 2014

When it comes to insurance coverage for key infrastructure assets, several fundamental questions emerge:Can our current infrastructure withstand sea

State AGs in the news

  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 4 2014

The AGs of Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri and the U.S. Department of Justice simultaneously filed acomplaint and proposed final judgment in the U.S

Superstorm Sandy litigation ruling on hold pending parallel mediation

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 27 2014

By way of update to our previous report on 8 May 2013, on 12 August 2014 the New York federal court managing the consolidated Superstorm Sandy