We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 305

Wisconsin Supreme Court applies pollution exclusion to well contaminated with manure

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2015

Recently, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the pollution exclusion applies to well water contamination arising from the application of manure to

The new U.S.-Cuba policy: summary of Amendments to CACR EAR Regulations

  • Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter
  • -
  • Cuba, USA
  • -
  • January 21 2015

After more than 50 years of severed diplomatic relations, President Obama announced on December 17, 2014, a new path for U.S. relations with Cuba. To

Wisconsin Supreme Court: pollution exclusion bars coverage for well contamination resulting from the application of manure and septage as fertilizer

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2015

In Wilson Mutual Ins. Co. v. Robert Falk and Jane Falk, 2013AP691 & 2013AP776, and Preisler v. Kuettel's Septic Serv., 2012AP2521, the Wisconsin

Wisconsin Supreme Court issues two rulings finding manure and septage to be “pollutants”

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

On December 30, 2014, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin issued two decisions - Preisler v. General Casualty Ins. Co., 2014 WL 7373070 (Dec. 30, 2014

Wasteland: how old insurance policies can be used for cleanup costs

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2014

This month's issue of National Geographic includes an interesting article and interactive MAP regarding the status of investigation and clean-up of

Do we have coverage for this? Sometimes it’s worth getting a second opinion

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Do you have coverage for claims? Here is a perfect example of a situation where you might not want to take no for an answer. Recently, a firm client

New York Supreme Court pro rata allocation for MGP sites on Long Island clarifies self-insured periods

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 31 2014

A New York State trial court judge applied a pro rata time on the risk allocation for pollution from manufactured gas plants on Long Island.Keyspan

10th Cir. rejects claim that pollution exclusion in liability policies are ambiguous and inapplicable

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2014

On October 20, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling that the commercial liability

Texas Supreme Court will decide important CERCLA insurance matter

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 22 2014

The Texas Supreme Court confirmed that it will decide an issue of Texas law that was certified to the Court by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Civil penalties arising from EPA consent decree are covered by general liability insurance

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2014

A Louisiana federal court held in Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Ins. Co. that a general liability insurer must indemnify its