We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 309

Down in the dumps: court refuses to apply pollution exclusion in landfill seepage case

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2015

Claims involving potential coverage for pollution liability pose unique challenges for insurers. In many cases, the polluting activity occurred

Seventh Circuit applies Indiana choice of law rules to deny insurance coverage for contamination at an Indiana manufacturing facility

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2015

Hoosier land owners sleep well at night knowing that they are insured against liability for environmental contamination because Indiana does not

Separate contract serves to limit insurance coverage for Deepwater Horizon spill, Texas Supreme Court rules

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2015

The Texas Supreme Court rejected BP’s $750 million claim for coverage under Transocean insurance policies. Since the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil

Multi-million dollar insurance bad faith claim in environmental contamination case affirmed on appeal

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2015

An environmental contamination case resulting in a $3.4 million award for emotional distress and punitive damages due to unfair claims settlement

Wisconsin Supreme Court applies pollution exclusion to well contaminated with manure

  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 26 2015

Recently, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the pollution exclusion applies to well water contamination arising from the application of manure to

The new U.S.-Cuba policy: summary of Amendments to CACR EAR Regulations

  • Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter
  • -
  • Cuba, USA
  • -
  • January 21 2015

After more than 50 years of severed diplomatic relations, President Obama announced on December 17, 2014, a new path for U.S. relations with Cuba. To

Wisconsin Supreme Court: pollution exclusion bars coverage for well contamination resulting from the application of manure and septage as fertilizer

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2015

In Wilson Mutual Ins. Co. v. Robert Falk and Jane Falk, 2013AP691 & 2013AP776, and Preisler v. Kuettel's Septic Serv., 2012AP2521, the Wisconsin

Wisconsin Supreme Court issues two rulings finding manure and septage to be “pollutants”

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

On December 30, 2014, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin issued two decisions - Preisler v. General Casualty Ins. Co., 2014 WL 7373070 (Dec. 30, 2014

Wasteland: how old insurance policies can be used for cleanup costs

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 5 2014

This month's issue of National Geographic includes an interesting article and interactive MAP regarding the status of investigation and clean-up of

Do we have coverage for this? Sometimes it’s worth getting a second opinion

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2014

Do you have coverage for claims? Here is a perfect example of a situation where you might not want to take no for an answer. Recently, a firm client