We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Employer not liable under CERCLA for employee's actions

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2012

On November 9, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (No. 0:11-cv-00619-DWF-FLN), ruled that Northern States Power Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Xcel Energy, (“Xcel”) was not liable for the unauthorized actions of its former employee that resulted in environmental contamination

Respondeat superior under Ohio environmental law

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 2 2011

Are Ohio employers liable for environmental violations caused by employees who consciously violate company policies?

FAQs regarding criminal search warrants

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2011

It is a general counsel's worst nightmare--the 8:00 a.m. call from a plant manager saying there are 25 federal agents at the office with a search warrant seizing the company's business records, taking employees aside to question them, and pulling samples from the plant's holding tanks and wastewater discharge