We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Federal court dismisses CERCLA contribution claims

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2011

A federal court in the Northern District of Illinois granted a motion dismissing all claims against a defendant facing CERCLA contribution claims, holding that the defendant’s acquisition of the assets of an alleged polluter was too remote for the defendant to be held liable

U.S. EPA’s bact guidance for greenhouse gases

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2010

Beginning on January 2, 2011, U.S. EPA will begin regulating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new and modified stationary sources, such as power plants, refineries, and manufacturing facilities under the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V permitting programs

Federal Court reins in Corps’ regulation of wetlands

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2010

A federal District Court judge in Florida has issued an order prohibiting the Army Corps of Engineers from expanding the Corps' authority under the Clean Water Act without first going through the appropriate administrative procedures

CERCLA owneroperator liability is determined when cleanup costs are incurred

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 10 2010

In a matter of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that, for the purposes of CERCLA liability, an owner or operator is determined at the time cleanup costs are incurred, and not when the lawsuit is filed

Global warming lawsuit thrown out by federal court of appeals

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2010

In a surprising turn of events, the Fifth Circuit has dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal in Comer v. Murphy Oil based on a procedural technicality, holding that the court lacked a quorum to hear the appeal

Global warming lawsuit thrown out by federal court of appeals

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 11 2010

In a surprising turn of events, the Fifth Circuit has dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal in Comer v. Murphy Oil based on a procedural technicality, holding that the court lacked a quorum to hear the appeal