We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 21

This week in hydraulic fracturing

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2013

Inspector General report claims EPA lacks sufficient data on oil and gas emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency Inspector General issued a

This week in hydraulic fracturing

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2013

EPA Reports Oil and Gas Sector Has Second Highest GHG Emissions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") released a report on its greenhouse

This week in hydraulic fracturing

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

EPA to reconsider portions of oil & gas NSPS. The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will reconsider portions of its New Source Performance

This week in hydraulic fracturing

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2013

Environmental groups have sued the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), claiming that BLM's review of potential environmental harms under the

This week in hydraulic fracturing

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2013

The Department of Interior (DOI) announced it is revising a draft rule regulating hydraulic fracturing on federal land managed by the U.S. Bureau of

New EPA interpretation on the status of debris contaminated by PCBs from caulk and other building materials

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2012

On November 16, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) posted its “PCB Bulk Product Waste Reinterpretation” (“Reinterpretation”) on the Agency’s PCB website

Sixth Circuit rejects EPA’s longstanding interpretation requiring small “interrelated” emission sources to obtain Title V and PSD permits

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA or The Agency) interpretation of the term “contiguous or adjacent” under the Clean Air Act in determining when multiple emission sources are close enough together to be considered a single stationary source for purposes of the Title V operating permit and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) construction permit programs

EPA releases final rule deferring regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass combustion under the Clean Air Act permitting pPrograms

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 6 2011

On July 1, 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that Administrator Lisa P. Jackson signed a final rule deferring for three years “the application of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V permitting requirements to biogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from bioenergy and other biogenic stationary sources.”

D.C. Circuit upholds EPA interpretation that used material becomes a “spent material” subject to RCRA regulation after it can no longer serve purpose of its initial use

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2010

The D.C. Circuit issued a 2-1 decision on August 6, 2010 that could expand the scope of what constitutes a “spent material” subject to regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and thus could limit the re-use and sale of materials that companies have used in their processes

Waxman TSCA “reform” bill would radically expand chemical regulation and impose new safety and reporting requirements

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2010

On July 22, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) introduced H.R. 5820, the “Toxic Chemicals Safety Act of 2010.”