We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Extensions of certian Alaska oil & gas leases

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

The State of Alaska has amended state law to provide for extension of the primary term of oil and gas leases on state lands when such extensions are

Minnesota Court of Appeals sides with Orono resident in wind turbine permit dispute

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 25 2012

Earlier this week, the Minnesota Court of Appeals weighed in on a long-running dispute between the City of Orono and city resident Jay Nygard over the installation of a small wind turbine on Mr. Nygard’s property

Recent developments regarding five-percent safe harbor for 1603 grant

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 9 2011

To qualify for a grant in lieu of tax credits for specified energy property under section 1603 of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("section 1603"), qualifying property must be placed in service in 2009, 2010, or 2011, or, if it is not placed in service during that period, construction must begin in 2009, 2010, or 2011 and the property must be placed in service before the applicable "credit termination date."

LEED avoids class action, energy savings claim left untested

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 23 2011

There’s big news in the battle between consultants in the green building industry and the U.S. Green Building Council

MATL dispute headed back to district court

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2011

The Montana Supreme Court has reversed a December 2010 district court decision that found that the developers of the Montana-Alberta Tie Line merchant transmission project do not possess eminent domain authority under Montana law and therefore could not take private land from a nonconsenting landowner

The law of marine and hydrokinetic energy

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2011

The developer or owner of a marine or hydrokinetic power project will typically hold a variety of real property rights, maritime rights, equipment, permits and regulatory approvals, and intellectual property rights