We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 67

Energy & environment update - March 10, 2014

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • China, European Union, Japan, Mexico, USA
  • -
  • March 10 2014

Though we shared with you our analysis of the energy and environment portions of President Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget request last week, we

NSPS challenges dismissed

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 16 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed as premature December 13 power industry challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed CO2 emissions limit for new fossil fuel fired power plants

GHG permitting challenged

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2012

The American Petroleum Institute, American Fuel and Petrochemicals Manufacturers, National Association of Manufacturers, and the National Oilseed Processors Association filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit September 10 challenging the third step of the Environmental Protection Agency’s tailoring rule

Energy & environment update February 10, 2014 - states

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 10 2014

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled February 6 that power companies are not liable for alleged modification

Court to not rehear water pollution case

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to rehear a case involving a settlement between the Environmental Protection

Mountaintop mine permit authority

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2012

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled March 23 that the Environmental Protection Agency exceeded its authority by revoking permits for what could now become West Virginia’s largest mountaintop removal mine

Cellulosic lawsuit

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2012

The American Petroleum Institute filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit July 24 against the Environmental Protection Agency over the agency’s denial of petitions to waive requirements for refiners to blend cellulosic biofuel into their fuels in 2011

Ks utilities entitled to nuclear storage costs

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 15 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled July 12 that three Kansas utilities that together own the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station near Burlington, Kansas, correctly apportioned their overhead costs for constructing spent fuel storage facilities and are therefore entitled to receive such costs from the federal government

ND haze implementation plan reconsideration

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2013

In a September 23 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider part of its haze

Energy & environment update February 3, 2014 - Environmental Protection Agency

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2014

Monroe Energy filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit January 28 challenging the Environmental Protection