We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,205

Colorado Lone Pine case could be important for hydraulic fracturing litigationand maybe smaller-scale toxic tort litigation generally

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 2 2013

The Colorado case of Strudley v. Antero Resources Corp., No. 2012 CA 1251 (Colo. Ct. App.), centers on the use of a so-called Lone Pine order in the

West Virginia Supreme Court reverses trial court rulings, reinstates flood litigation cases

  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2008

On June 26, 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a per curiam decision in the Mass Litigation Proceeding known as In Re: Flood Litigation (Civ. Action No. 02-C-797, Raleigh County Circuit Court), reversing separate rulings issued by Circuit Court Judges Recht and Hutchison that would have substantially limited plaintiffs' ability to go forward with such claims

Supreme Court upholds Mobile-Sierra doctrine for market-based contract rates

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2008

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court decided the much-anticipated case of Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc., v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County

FERC sets market manipulation cases for hearing

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 31 2008

In a pair of show cause orders issued on July 26, 2007, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) proposed to exercise for the first time in contested proceedings its recently granted authority under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) to impose civil penalties of up to $1 million per day per violation for violations of those statutes, or of the Commission’s rules, regulations, and orders promulgated thereunder

CFTC seeks intervention in Amaranth-FERC case

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 18 2008

On January 7, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit a motion for leave to intervene in an action filed by Amaranth Advisors, L.L.C. and others against the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), in which Amaranth challenges FERC’s authority to initiate a proceeding alleging manipulation in the trading of natural gas futures contracts

Supreme Court environmental rulings boost confidence in alternative energy investments

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2007

Two recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings on environmental issues give support to agencies and companies investing in renewable energy

Two U.S. Supreme Court rulings pave the way, maybe

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2007

On April 2, 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision (Massachusetts, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al.) that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had a duty to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) and three other greenhouse gases (GHGs) as air pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) unless it could find better support to justify its decision than it articulated to the court

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court disallows sales tax refund for electricity distribution, transmission and transition charges

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 25 2007

Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court disallowed a taxpayer’s request for a refund of sales tax paid on distribution, transmission and transition charges associated with the taxpayer’s electricity purchases

Colorado Supreme Court strikes down county ordinance regulating natural resources development

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 21 2009

In a case that may help shape the boundaries between local and state oversight of natural resources development, on January 12, 2009, the Colorado Supreme Court struck down a Summit County land use ordinance that prohibited the use of cyanide and other toxic or acidic chemicals in heap or vat leach mining operations

Colorado Court of Appeals affirms Hogan & Hartson defense of power plant construction permits in Colorado for client Xcel Energy

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2008

On February 7, 2008, the Colorado Court of Appeals, in a coherent, straight-forward opinion, comprehensively affirmed a Colorado state district court decision upholding Colorado Air Pollution Control Division permits for construction of a third generating unit (Unit 3) at Hogan & Hartson client Xcel Energy Company’s Comanche coal-fired power plant in Pueblo, Colorado

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy