We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15

U.S. Supreme Court hears natural gas case in which 21 state AGs file brief

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2015

On Monday, January 12, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the preemption case, Oneok v. Learjet. In reliance on state law private

Expensive lessons learned after 8th Circuit rules against wind developer in its $400 million suit against a Minnesota utility

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

A large wind developer, enXco Development Corp. ("enXco"), learned a hard lesson about the importance of negotiating flexibility in contracts to deal

Iowa Supreme Court decision boosts renewable energy development

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 18 2014

A recent Iowa Supreme Court decision may give a boost to small-scale renewable energy development in that state. On July 11, the court issued its

WTO rules U.S. countervailing duties on solar panels violate global trade rules

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • China, Global, USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

The World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled Monday that U.S. countervailing duties imposed on a range of Chinese products, including solar panels

What’s next for conflict minerals rules after D.C. Circuit decision?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2014

On April 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued its long-anticipated ruling in the industry

D.C. Circuit partially strikes down SEC conflict minerals rules

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

On April 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in the challenge to the SEC's conflict minerals

Could “free speech” issues derail the SEC’s conflict minerals rule?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2014

Shortly after the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted its conflict minerals disclosure rule in August 2012, a coalition of business

SEC wins victory in conflict minerals rules litigation

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 25 2013

The SEC's conflict minerals rules have withstood judicial challenge so far. On July 23, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of

Seventh Circuit presents statute of limitations roadblock for future PSD enforcement matters

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2013

On July 8, 2013, in United States v. Midwest Generation, et. Al, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the failure to obtain a

D.C. Circuit upholds FERC decision to maintain price caps on natural gas pipeline capacity sales

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2010

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently upheld two FERC orders that permanently lift cost-based price ceilings on natural gas shippers' releases of unused firm pipeline transportation capacity into the short-term market (one year or less), while retaining price ceilings on sales by natural gas pipelines