We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

CIT affirms CBP’s classification of gasoline

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2010

On June 2, 2010, the CIT issued its decision in BP Products North America Inc. v. United States, a dispute over the classification of 93 octane conventional gasoline

Bipartisan legislation proposed to extend ethanol incentives

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

On April 20, 2010, US Senators Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) introduced legislation (S. 3231) that seeks to extend certain ethanol incentives through 2015

Canadian natural gas importer seeks MPF refund from CBP

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2010

On August 26, 2010, Selkirk Cogen Partners LP (Selkirk), a Canadian importer of natural gas, filed a complaint with the US Court of International Trade (CIT) seeking a refund with interest of Merchandise Processing Fees (MPFs) it paid on natural gas imported into the United States from January 2004 to February 2008