We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 521

Third Circuit adopts and expands “employee” test for Title VII cases

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently adopted a six-factor test to determine whether a shareholder-director of a company could be

Customer list not secret enough

  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

An employer was unable to protect the confidentiality of its customer list, because it failed to present any evidence that the list was worthy of

Fallout from Nosal verdict

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2013

Practitioners in the area of trade secret protection and employee mobility law are still trying to sort out the impact of a federal court jury

Corporate recruiter convicted of computer fraud and trade secret theft by San Francisco jury

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

A California federal jury convicted a San Francisco executive recruiter this week for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA") and

The Inbox - April 19, 2013

  • Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Today's super-sized Inbox covers all the recent news in suits by suits: "Show me the money!" Tom Cruise may have said it most memorably, but we all

5 privacy and data security measures that can protect your company against trade secret theft

  • Covington & Burling LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

At a recent forum in New York, a team of Covington lawyers addressed the growing concern among companies that their most valuable assets could leave

Employment agreement tip of the week No. 1: get it in writing

  • Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2013

Whether you're an executive or a hiring manager, here's a tip: if you think you have an employment agreement, or if you want to have an employment

Crowdsourced workers: are they employees or independent contractors?

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2013

What happens when modern innovations in the workforce (made possible by the advent of the internet) collide with traditional concepts of employment

Protecting trade secrets with a mobile workforce and telecommuters

  • Jackson Lewis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 18 2013

Regardless of where one stands philosophically on the merits of working from a physical office where greater collegiality can be fostered, versus

Minnesota House Bill threatens to void non-compete agreements

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 27 2013

Many businesses in Minnesota execute non-compete agreements with their employees in order to protect their legitimate business interests. Non-compete