We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

The Supreme Court -- June 20, 2011

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 20 2011

The Supreme Court of the United States announced decisions in four cases this morning:

Toxic tort plaintiff's feet held to fire on causation evidence in New York

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2012

New York’s appellate courts continue to hold toxic tort plaintiffs and their experts to rigorous standards when it comes to proof of causation

BLG Monthly Update

  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • -
  • Argentina, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • December 19 2012

The BLG Monthly Update is a digest of recent developments in the law which Neil Guthrie, our National Director of Research, thinks you will find

The Supreme Court: cases to watch in the October 2013 term

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2013

This week marks the first Monday in October, which for Supreme Court watchers is a holiday: the start of a new term. While not everyone gets that

Noteworthy cases in the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 term

  • Larkin Hoffman
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 21 2011

The first Monday in October represents the start of a new term for the United States Supreme Court

Legalized marijuana and the workplace: preparing for the trend

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 13 2012

As the smoke from the 2012 election dissipates, one clear winner has emerged: marijuana

Swallowing heroin costs public employee his job

  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 12 2011

In State v. Kennedy, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2011), the question presented to the Appellate Division was whether the criminal offense of tampering with physical evidence was “an offense involving dishonesty,” which would require the defendant to forfeit his public employment under N.J.S.A. 2C:51-2(a)(1

The Supreme Court - February 19, 2013

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2013

The Supreme Court of the United States announced decisions in four cases this morning: Florida v. Harris, No. 11-817: This case concerned how a court