We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18,120

Texas Supreme Court: opposition to inappropriate but not unlawful acts is not protected activity under Texas law

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2015

On April 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas released an opinion in a case brought under Texas law that will help Texas employers defend themselves

Utah Supreme Court highlights importance of disclaimers in employee handbooks

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Guidance for employers seeking to maintain the at-will status of their employees and prevent employee handbooks and policies from becoming

Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects claim that union could not waive paid meal period rights on behalf of members

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Unionized employers often enter into agreements with employees regarding compensation for particular hours or break periods. These agreements are

Wisconsin Supreme Court concludes that continued at-will employment constitutes lawful consideration

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

On April 30, 2015, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. Friedlen et al, concluding that

New York Court of Appeals applies federal impact analysis under state law

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Margerum v. City of Buffalo, 24 N.Y.3d 721 (N.Y. Feb. 17, 2015): The New York Court of Appeals held that, where an employer has allegedly engaged in

Supreme Court decision affirming judicial right to review EEOC actions

  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

A unanimous Supreme Court yesterday upheld the right of courts to review whether the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) adequately

Supreme Court holds that EEOC conciliation efforts in Title VII claims are subject to limited judicial review

  • Paul Hastings LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") can bring suit against an employer, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires

Paradigm shift: triple standard of reasonable accommodations

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

The old reliable rules seem less reliable these days. It is no longer enough to treat all employees the same. We have entered an era of interactive

Alleged victim of sex discrimination recovers $13 million

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Earlier this month, in the case Robertson v. Hunter Panels LLC et al., a Pennsylvania federal jury awarded a female employee $13 million after

Second Circuit clarifies that FLSA’s anti-retaliation protection includes oral complaints

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2015

Greathouse v. JHS Security Inc., No. 12-4521 (2d Cir. Apr. 20, 2015): The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the Southern District