We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 522

On premises, on-call time compensable; sleep time not excluded

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

Emphasizing that California law provides greater protections than federal law to on-call employees, the California Supreme Court in Mendiola v. CPS

But no agreement to arbitrate where agreement contains PAGA waiver that was not severable

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

When an arbitration agreement contained an unenforceable waiver of claims under California's Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") and the agreement

California security guards’ on-call break periods not compensable work time

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

In contrast to the California Supreme Court's ruling in Mendiola, a California appeals court in Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc. held that

Buyer permitted to enforce arbitration agreement with acquired company’s employees

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

A California court of appeal ruled in Marenco v. DirecTV, LLC that DirecTV could enforce an arbitration agreement between a company it purchased and

Termination of employee for engaging in outside work while on FMLACFRA upheld, but “honest belief” standard not addressed

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

In Richey v. AutoNation, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that an arbitrator committed no legal error when he determined that an employer

Inability to work for boss not a disability; transfer to another supervisor not a reasonable accommodation

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 18 2015

In Alsup v. U.S. Bancorp, a federal district court in California dismissed a plaintiff's claims of disability discrimination, failure to accommodate

Waiting for and undergoing security checks not compensable time

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

The United States Supreme Court recently held in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk et al. That time spent waiting for and undergoing

NLRB expands employees’ use of email for protected activity

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or the "Board") has yet again expanded employees' rights to discuss the terms and conditions of their

California Supreme Court denies review of cell phone reimbursement case

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

In August, a California appellate court held in Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. that employers must reimburse employees for mandatory use of

Perceived whistleblower protected by Labor Code

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

In Diego v. Pilgrim United Church of Christ, a California appellate court held that an employee was protected from retaliation under the California