Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Noel Canning v. NLRB: the decision, its potential impact, and the future of the national Labor Relations Board

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
February 4 2013

On Friday, January 25, 2013, we informed you that the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington D.C. had struck down President Obama's "recess

Federal court strikes down President Obama's NLRB recess appointments as unconstitutional

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
January 25 2013

In a unanimous panel decision issued this morning in Noel Canning v. NLRB, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that

South Carolina federal court finds the NLRB's Employee Rights Notice-Posting Rule invalid and unenforceable

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
April 16 2012

On Friday, April 13, a South Carolina federal judge ruled that the National Labor Relations Board's ("NLRB" or "Board") Employee Rights Notice-Posting Rule is invalid and unenforceable

D.C. Circuit enjoins NLRB notice-posting rule

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
April 17 2012

Earlier today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia enjoined the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) from enforcing its Employee Rights Notice-Posting Rule. (Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. NLRB, D.C. Cir., No. 12-5068, injunction pending appeal, April 17, 2012

Acting General Counsel signals departure from Collyer deferral policy

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
April 4 2012

The Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has recently circulated two memoranda detailing a new approach to pre-arbitral deferral of Section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) unfair labor practice cases

NLRB requires specific business justifications for confidentiality requests made during internal investigations

Baker & Hostetler LLP
-
USA
-
August 29 2012

On July 30, 2012, in a decision that applies equally to union and nonunion employers, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") held that employers violate protected employee rights by maintaining and applying blanket prohibitions on employee discussion of ongoing internal investigations