We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18

Sixth Circuit affirms summary judgment against EEOC in credit check suit

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") v. Kaplan Higher Education Corp., No. 13-3408 (6th Cir. Apr. 9, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals

Employment law counseling & training tip of the month

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

Now is the time of year when many employers look forward to the arrival of winterspring interns or volunteers, often students, but not infrequently

Supreme Court’s Sandifer decision is not just about changing clothes

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2014

In Sandifer et al. V. United States Steel Corp., a unanimous Supreme Court clarified the meaning of "changing clothes" found in Section 203(o) of the

Broad definition of "disability" endorsed by Fourth Circuit

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2014

In its recently published opinion in Summers v. Altarum Institute, Corp., No. 13-1645, decided January 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals

New York Court of Appeals approves warrantless GPS tracking of government employees

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2013

On June 27, 2013, a divided New York Court of Appeals held in Cunningham v. New York State Dept. Of Labor, that the state can use GPS tracking to

New York Court of Appeals permits warrantless GPS tracking of government employees

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2013

On June 27, 2013, a divided New York Court of Appeals held in Cunningham v. New York State Dept. Of Labor, that the state can use GPS tracking to

Supreme Court's DOMA decision affects employers' obligations under the FMLA

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2013

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court struck down the federal law that defined "marriage" as a legal union between one man and one woman

New York Court of Appeals clarifies important questions about tip-sharing statute

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2013

On June 26, 2013, New York's highest court for the first time weighed in and ruled on what types of employees are qualified to participate in

Eleventh Circuit rules on FLSA “nursing mothers” provision

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

On December 26, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued the first decision by a federal Court of Appeals concerning the provisions

New York's highest court re-affirms at-will employment rule

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2012

In a 5-2 decision, the New York State Court of Appeals in Sullivan v. Harnisch, No. 82, 2012 N.Y. Slip. Op. 03574 (N.Y. May 8, 2012), refused to extend to compliance officers an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine articulated in Wieder v. Skala, 80 N.Y.2d 628 (1992