We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 508

Employer response to snow emergencies

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2012

Winter snow can create some unique and frustrating employment problems for employers

Contractors pay high penalties for prevailing wage violations

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2010

Prevailing wage is required on most Federal and Ohio construction projects

Court upholds double damages and punitive damages for USERRA violation

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2008

The federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the employment rights and benefits of military service members on their return from military duty

To pay or not to pay: when must employees be paid for training-related activities?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 5 2009

The United States Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD), issued several opinion letters earlier this year addressing whether various training-related activities constitute "hours worked" for non-exempt employees that are compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA

Ohio minimum wage increases by $.10, effective January 1, 2014

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2013

Effective January 1, 2014, the Ohio minimum wage will increase by 10 cents, from $7.85 per hour to $7.95 per hour. The Ohio minimum wage for

Could this be you? When employees fail to return company property, deducting the costs from final paychecks may seem like a good idea, but is it lawful?

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

A client called to say that an employee failed to return a company-owned laptop. The employer wanted to deduct the cost of the laptop from the

Court finds costs of hard copy production must be borne by requesting party; rejects magistrate judge’s analysis of cost-shifting under Zubulake; grants leave to seek cost-shifting under Rule 26(c)

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2008

In this case, the differences between electronic production and hard copy production were starkly highlighted, as was the difference between “production” and “copying.”

Ohio appellate court enforces non-competition agreement between hair stylist and Charles Penzone, Inc

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2008

Is a non-competition agreement enforceable?

Garnishments at all-time high

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 3 2015

According to a recent study by ADP, it would appear that garnishments are at or near an all-time high. And garnishments are not limited to child