We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 95

White House and ad networks release best practices

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2013

The White House's Office of the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), and leading ad

American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 30 2014

U.S. Supreme Court holds that Aereo's near-contemporaneous transmission of broadcast television programs over Internet to subscribers violates

Starr, et al. v. Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2010

Second Circuit holds that the plaintiff class adequately pled violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act against defendant producers and distributors of digital music, where the defendants’ alleged parallel conduct in selling music over the internet plausibly suggested that defendants entered into an agreement to fix prices and to restrain the availability and distribution of music over the internet

UMG Recordings Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor

Capitol Records Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2012

Circuit court reinstates $222,000 statutory damages award against defendant, individual, for willful infringement related to her downloading and making available through peer-to-peer file-sharing service 24 copyrighted sound recordings of plaintiffs, holding that award did not violate due process standards and that plaintiff was entitled to broader injunction

FTC letter states Pinterest contest entries are endorsements

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 3 2014

After investigating a contest promoting Cole Haan products on Pinterest, the FTC determined that contestants' pins were endorsements and that these

Columbia Pictures, Inc., et al. v. Bunnell, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2007

The district court granted plaintiff motion picture studios’ motion for terminating sanctions (i.e., a striking of the defenses and entry of default judgment against defendants) based on defendants’ willful spoliation of key evidence

Advertising accountability program issues first set of compliance warnings for violations of enhanced notice internet rules

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 30 2013

Signaling its intent to enforce industry-established guidelines relating to behavioral advertising, the Better Business Bureau's Online

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 29 2008

The Florida Supreme Court held that the state no longer recognizes a cause of action for false light invasion of privacy because it overlaps with defamation and “allows the plaintiff to circumvent the strict requirements that have been adopted by statute and developed by case law to ensure the right to freedom of expression.”

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Barrydriller Content Systems, plc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

California district court grants TV networks’ motion for preliminary injunction against internet streaming service, finding that, contrary to decisions by courts in the Second Circuit, streaming transmissions of copyrighted content likely infringed networks’ exclusive right to public performances